Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23144856›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

A personalized BEST: characterization of latent clinical classes of nonischemic heart failure that predict outcomes and response to bucindolol.

David P Kao, Brandie D Wagner, Alastair D Robertson, Michael R Bristow, Brian D Lowes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Four Distinct Health Profiles in Older Patients With Cancer: Latent Class Analysis of the Prospective ELCAPA Cohort.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David P KaoDivision of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA. David.Kao@ucdenver.edu
Brandie D Wagner
Alastair D Robertson
Michael R Bristow
Brian D Lowes
University of Colorado Denver · USColorado School of Public Health · USNebraska Hematology-Oncology · US

Funding

POSTGRADUATE TRAINING IN CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCHT32HL007822 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI BUTTRICK, PETER N., LEINWAND, LESLIE ANNE · 1996 to 2023
$6.2M
Combined Stem Cell and Assist Device Therapy for Heart FailureP20HL101438 · NHLBI · TEXAS HEART INSTITUTE · PI GREGORIC, IGOR, KAR, BISWAJIT · 2010 to 2011
$1.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS 5 P20 HL101438-01NHLBI NIH HHS L30 HL110124NHLBI NIH HHS P20 HL101438NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007822PHS HHS 2T32 NHL007822-12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFREF) are heterogenous, and our ability to identify patients likely to respond to therapy is limited. We present a method of identifying disease subtypes using high-dimensional clinical phenotyping and latent class analysis that may be useful in personalizing prognosis and treatment in HFREF.

methodsA total of 1121 patients with nonischemic HFREF from the β-blocker Evaluation of Survival Trial were categorized according to 27 clinical features. Latent class analysis was used to generate two latent class models, LCM A and B, to identify HFREF subtypes. LCM A consisted of features associated with HF pathogenesis, whereas LCM B consisted of markers of HF progression and severity. The Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) Score was also calculated for all patients. Mortality, improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) defined as an increase in LVEF ≥5% and a final LVEF of 35% after 12 months, and effect of bucindolol on both outcomes were compared across HFREF subtypes. Performance of models that included a combination of LCM subtypes and SHFM scores towards predicting mortality and LVEF response was estimated and subsequently validated using leave-one-out cross-validation and data from the Multicenter Oral Carvedilol Heart Failure Assessment Trial.

resultsA total of 6 subtypes were identified using LCM A and 5 subtypes using LCM B. Several subtypes resembled familiar clinical phenotypes. Prognosis, improvement in LVEF, and the effect of bucindolol treatment differed significantly between subtypes. Prediction improved with addition of both latent class models to SHFM for both 1-year mortality and LVEF response outcomes.

conclusionsThe combination of high-dimensional phenotyping and latent class analysis identifies subtypes of HFREF with implications for prognosis and response to specific therapies that may provide insight into mechanisms of disease. These subtypes may facilitate development of personalized treatment plans.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsAdultArea Under CurveBayes TheoremDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHeart FailureHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalMultivariate AnalysisPropanolaminesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsbucindololPropanolamines

Identifiers

PMID23144856
PMCPMC3492337
OpenAlexW2034008707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.