Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23144364›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of epidemiology2012

Job strain as a risk factor for leisure-time physical inactivity: an individual-participant meta-analysis of up to 170,000 men and women: the IPD-Work Consortium.

Eleonor I Fransson, Katriina Heikkilä, Solja T Nyberg, Marie Zins, Hugo Westerlund, Peter Westerholm, Ari Väänänen, Marianna Virtanen, Jussi Vahtera, Töres Theorell and 40 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of epidemiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Associations of job strain and lifestyle risk factors with risk of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of individual participant data.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2013
    Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

50 authors.

Eleonor I FranssonInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Box 210, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden. eleonor.fransson@ki.se
Katriina Heikkilä
Solja T Nyberg
Marie Zins
Hugo Westerlund
Peter Westerholm
Ari Väänänen
Marianna Virtanen
Jussi Vahtera
Töres Theorell
Sakari Suominen
Archana Singh-Manoux
Johannes Siegrist
Séverine Sabia
Reiner Rugulies
Jaana Pentti
Tuula Oksanen
Maria Nordin
Martin L Nielsen
Michael G Marmot
Linda L Magnusson Hanson
Ida E H Madsen
Thorsten Lunau
Constanze Leineweber
Meena Kumari
Anne Kouvonen
Aki Koskinen
Markku Koskenvuo
Anders Knutsson
France Kittel
Karl-Heinz Jöckel
Matti Joensuu
Irene L Houtman
Wendela E Hooftman
Marcel Goldberg
Goedele A Geuskens
Jane E Ferrie
Raimund Erbel
Nico Dragano
Dirk De Bacquer
Els Clays
Annalisa Casini
Hermann Burr
Marianne Borritz
Sébastien Bonenfant
Jakob B Bjorner
Lars Alfredsson
Mark Hamer
G David Batty
Mika Kivimäki

Funding

British Heart Foundation RG/07/008/23674Medical Research Council G0100222Medical Research Council G0902037Medical Research Council G19/35Medical Research Council G8802774
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unfavorable work characteristics, such as low job control and too high or too low job demands, have been suggested to increase the likelihood of physical inactivity during leisure time, but this has not been verified in large-scale studies. The authors combined individual-level data from 14 European cohort studies (baseline years from 1985-1988 to 2006-2008) to examine the association between unfavorable work characteristics and leisure-time physical inactivity in a total of 170,162 employees (50% women; mean age, 43.5 years). Of these employees, 56,735 were reexamined after 2-9 years. In cross-sectional analyses, the odds for physical inactivity were 26% higher (odds ratio = 1.26, 95% confidence interval: 1.15, 1.38) for employees with high-strain jobs (low control/high demands) and 21% higher (odds ratio = 1.21, 95% confidence interval: 1.11, 1.31) for those with passive jobs (low control/low demands) compared with employees in low-strain jobs (high control/low demands). In prospective analyses restricted to physically active participants, the odds of becoming physically inactive during follow-up were 21% and 20% higher for those with high-strain (odds ratio = 1.21, 95% confidence interval: 1.11, 1.32) and passive (odds ratio = 1.20, 95% confidence interval: 1.11, 1.30) jobs at baseline. These data suggest that unfavorable work characteristics may have a spillover effect on leisure-time physical activity.

Indexed as

ExerciseLeisure ActivitiesSedentary BehaviorAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEmploymentEuropeFemaleHumansMaleOccupational DiseasesPrevalenceProspective StudiesRegression AnalysisRisk FactorsStress, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID23144364
PMCPMC3521479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.