Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23143977›Full record

ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2013

Tumor dormancy, oncogene addiction, cellular senescence, and self-renewal programs.

David I Bellovin, Bikul Das, Dean W Felsher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
25.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A modelling framework for cancer ecology and evolution.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cancer research · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Targeting survivin in cancer: novel drug development approaches.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2014
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Macroautophagy and the oncogene-induced senescence.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2014
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David I BellovinDepartment of Medicine and Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5151, USA.
Bikul Das
Dean W Felsher
Stanford University · US

Funding

Small Animal ImagingP50CA114747 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI RAO, JIANGHONG · 2005 to 2014
$18.2M
Mechanisms by which Oncogene Inactivation Elicits Tumor Cell DeathR01CA170378 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FELSHER, DEAN W · 2012 to 2015
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA114747NCI NIH HHS R01 CA170378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancers are frequently addicted to initiating oncogenes that elicit aberrant cellular proliferation, self-renewal, and apoptosis. Restoration of oncogenes to normal physiologic regulation can elicit dramatic reversal of the neoplastic phenotype, including reduced proliferation and increased apoptosis of tumor cells (Science 297(5578):63-64, 2002). In some cases, oncogene inactivation is associated with compete elimination of a tumor. However, in other cases, oncogene inactivation induces a conversion of tumor cells to a dormant state that is associated with cellular differentiation and/or loss of the ability to self-replicate. Importantly, this dormant state is reversible, with tumor cells regaining the ability to self-renew upon oncogene reactivation. Thus, understanding the mechanism of oncogene inactivation-induced dormancy may be crucial for predicting therapeutic outcome of targeted therapy. One important mechanistic insight into tumor dormancy is that oncogene addiction might involve regulation of a decision between self-renewal and cellular senescence. Recent evidence suggests that this decision is regulated by multiple mechanisms that include tumor cell-intrinsic, cell-autonomous mechanisms and host-dependent, tumor cell-non-autonomous programs (Mol Cell 4(2):199-207, 1999; Science 297(5578):102-104, 2002; Nature 431(7012):1112-1117, 2004; Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(32):13028-13033, 2007). In particular, the tumor microenvironment, which is known to be critical during tumor initiation (Cancer Cell 7(5):411-423, 2005; J Clin Invest 121(6):2436-2446, 2011), prevention (Nature 410(6832):1107-1111, 2001), and progression (Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 21(1):3-10, 2010), also appears to dictate when oncogene inactivation elicits the permanent loss of self-renewal through induction of cellular senescence (Nat Rev Clin Oncol 8(3):151-160, 2011; Science 313(5795):1960-1964, 2006; N Engl J Med 351(21):2159-21569, 2004). Thus, oncogene addiction may be best modeled as a consequence of the interplay amongst cell-autonomous and host-dependent programs that define when a therapy will result in tumor dormancy.

Indexed as

Cellular SenescenceGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticOncogenesTranscriptional ActivationAnimalsApoptosisBiomarkers, TumorCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCell Cycle CheckpointsCell DifferentiationComputational BiologyEarly Detection of CancerHumansImmunologic FactorsMiceModels, BiologicalBiomarkers, TumorImmunologic FactorsMyc protein, mouseProto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc

Identifiers

PMID23143977
PMCPMC3773491
OpenAlexW25968677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.