Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23143939›Full record

Trial reportDrugs & aging2012

Comparison of intranasal ketorolac tromethamine pharmacokinetics in younger and older adults.

Roy Bullingham, Axel Juan

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drugs & aging, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Intranasal ketorolac versus intravenous ketorolac for treatment of migraine headaches in children: A randomized clinical trial.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2022
    Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Roy BullinghamRoy.Bullingham@att.net
Axel Juan
Bellingham Technical College · USSeaView Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) ketorolac tromethamine shows higher plasma concentrations and a longer plasma half-life in adults ≥65 years of age than in subjects aged <65 years, after intramuscular administration. An intranasal formulation of ketorolac tromethamine is approved for short-term treatment of moderate to moderately severe pain requiring analgesia at the opioid level.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of a single intranasal dose of ketorolac tromethamine 31.5 mg (15.75 mg per nostril) in adults aged ≥65 and <65 years.

methodsHealthy adults with body mass indices of 15-30 kg/m(2) were eligible for the study. Following intranasal ketorolac tromethamine dosing, blood samples (approximately 7 mL per sample) for pharmacokinetic assessment were obtained at 15, 30 and 45 min and 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 15 and 24 h after dosing. Plasma ketorolac concentration versus time data were analysed to determine maximum (peak) ketorolac concentration (C(max)) and time to reach C(max) (t(max)) and estimate pharmacokinetic parameters.

resultsThirty healthy subjects were enrolled in and completed the study. For analysis, data were stratified by participant age into two groups, consisting of younger adult subjects (<65 years of age) and older adult subjects (≥65 years of age). Mean (±SD) age was 44 ± 10 and 72 ± 6 years in the younger and older groups, respectively. Mean (±SD) plasma ketorolac C(max) was 10 % higher (2,028.8 ± 1,069.5 and 1,840.1 ± 995.9 ng/mL) and mean (±SD) terminal elimination half-life (t(½β)) was 37 % longer (4.52 ± 1.14 and 3.31 ± 0.96 h) in the ≥65-years age group than in the <65-years group, respectively. Mean (±SD) plasma ketorolac area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(∞)) was 28 % higher in older subjects than in younger subjects (8,794.8 ± 4,129.4 and 6,890.8 ± 3,448.5 ng · h/mL, respectively). Differences were not statistically significant, but did not demonstrate formal equivalence. Mean (±SD) residence time was 36 % higher in the ≥65-years age group than in the <65-years group (6.02 ± 1.50 and 4.44 ± 1.06 h, respectively) (p = 0.003). There were no serious adverse events during the study. Two mild events of headache and eyelid infection occurred. There were no clinically relevant changes or an apparent difference between age groups in laboratory or physical assessments.

conclusionThe increased systemic exposure to ketorolac following intranasal administration in adults ≥65 years of age warrants reduction of the intranasal ketorolac tromethamine dose, and halving the dose to 15.75 mg (one spray to one nostril) in this patient population is recommended based on similar dosing adjustments made for intramuscular ketorolac tromethamine.

Indexed as

Administration, IntranasalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalArea Under CurveHumansKetorolac TromethamineMiddle AgedAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalKetorolac Tromethamine

Identifiers

PMID23143939
OpenAlexW2116522974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.