Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23143773›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2013

Safety and immunogenicity of an FP9-vectored candidate tuberculosis vaccine (FP85A), alone and with candidate vaccine MVA85A in BCG-vaccinated healthy adults: a phase I clinical trial.

Rosalind Rowland, Ansar A Pathan, Iman Satti, Ian D Poulton, Magali M L Matsumiya, Megan Whittaker, Angela M Minassian, Geraldine A O'Hara, Matthew Hamill, Janet T Scott and 9 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00653770 (A Phase I Study to Assess the Safety and Immunogenicity of New TB Vaccine Candidates FP85A and MVA85A, in Healthy Adults Who Have Previously Been Immunized With BCG, Using a Prime-boost Delivery Schedule), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00653770 phase1completednot on this map

A Phase I Study to Assess the Safety and Immunogenicity of New TB Vaccine Candidates FP85A and MVA85A, in Healthy Adults Who Have Previously Been Immunized With BCG, Using a Prime-boost Delivery Schedule

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OxfordRan2007 to 2010Enrolled31ConditionsTuberculosisArmsFP85A, MVA85A
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. MVA85A vaccine to enhance BCG for preventing tuberculosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Vaccine against tuberculosis: what's new?BMC infectious diseases · 2014
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Aerosol immunisation for TB: matching route of vaccination to route of infection.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2015
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rosalind RowlandJenner Institute; University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ansar A Pathan
Iman Satti
Ian D Poulton
Magali M L Matsumiya
Megan Whittaker
Angela M Minassian
Geraldine A O'Hara
Matthew Hamill
Janet T Scott
Stephanie A Harris
Hazel C Poyntz
Cynthia Bateman
Joel Meyer
Nicola Williams
Sarah C Gilbert
Alison M Lawrie
Adrian V S Hill
Helen McShane
Jenner Institute · GBScience Oxford · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 090532Wellcome Trust 095540Wellcome Trust 095780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The safety and immunogenicity of a new candidate tuberculosis (TB) vaccine, FP85A was evaluated alone and in heterologous prime-boost regimes with another candidate TB vaccine, MVA85A. This was an open label, non-controlled, non-randomized Phase I clinical trial. Healthy previously BCG-vaccinated adult subjects were enrolled sequentially into three groups and vaccinated with FP85A alone, or both FP85A and MVA85A, with a four week interval between vaccinations. Passive and active data on adverse events were collected. Immunogenicity was evaluated by Enzyme Linked Immunospot (ELISpot), flow cytometry and Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Most adverse events were mild and there were no vaccine-related serious adverse events. FP85A vaccination did not enhance antigen 85A-specific cellular immunity. When MVA85A vaccination was preceded by FP85A vaccination, cellular immune responses were lower compared with when MVA85A vaccination was the first immunisation. MVA85A vaccination, but not FP85A vaccination, induced anti-MVA IgG antibodies. Both MVA85A and FP85A vaccinations induced anti-FP9 IgG antibodies. In conclusion, FP85A vaccination was well tolerated but did not induce antigen-specific cellular immune responses. We hypothesize that FP85A induced anti-FP9 IgG antibodies with cross-reactivity for MVA85A, which may have mediated inhibition of the immune response to subsequent MVA85A. ClinicalTrials.gov identification number: NCT00653770.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, BacterialDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayEnzyme-Linked Immunospot AssayFemaleFlow CytometryHumansImmunoglobulin GMaleMiddle AgedT-LymphocytesTuberculosis VaccinesVaccinationVaccines, DNAViral VaccinesAntibodies, BacterialImmunoglobulin GMVA 85ATuberculosis VaccinesVaccines, DNAViral Vaccinesheterologous prime-boost regimesphase I clinical trialpoxvirus-vectored subunit vaccinestuberculosis vaccines

Identifiers

PMID23143773
PMCPMC3667946
OpenAlexW2009515188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.