Trial reportDigestive diseases and sciences2013
Prone positioning of obese patients for colonoscopy results in shortened cecal intubation times: a randomized trial.
Trial report in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03337217 (Colonoscopy in the Prone Position for Patients With BMI Greater Than 30 Is Superior to Standard Left Lateral Decubitus Position), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Colonoscopy in the Prone Position for Patients With BMI Greater Than 30 Is Superior to Standard Left Lateral Decubitus Position
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Starting position during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Techniques in coloproctology · 2024Pooled it
- Risk factors associated with longer cecal intubation time: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2018Pooled it
- Colonoscopy Insertion in Patients with Gastrectomy: Does Position Impact Cecal Intubation Time?Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022Trial
- A randomized controlled trial comparing right and left lateral decubitus starting position on outcomes in colonoscopy.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Trial
- Use of an Abdominal Compression Device in Colonoscopy: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2016Trial
- Right Or Left in COLonoscopy (ROLCOL)? A Randomized Controlled Trial of Right- versus Left-Sided Starting Position in Colonoscopy.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2015Trial
- Investigation of the relationship between colonoscopy insertion difficulty factors and endoscope shape using an endoscopic position detection unit.Journal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition · 2024Article
- Patient Position in Operative Endoscopy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Article
- Article
- Efficacy and tolerability of colonoscopies in overweight and obese patients: Results from a national database on gastrointestinal endoscopic outcomes.Endoscopy international open · 2022Article
- Different position from traditional left lateral for colonoscopy? A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized control trials.Chronic diseases and translational medicine · 2021Article
- Efficacy and safety of the starting position during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Endoscopy international open · 2020Review
- Colonoscopy procedural skills and training for new beginners.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Review
- Colonoscopy in obese patients: time to change position.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2013Article
- Comparison of left versus right lateral starting position on colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObesity is a risk factor for colorectal cancer, and colonoscopy can be technically challenging in obese patients. It has been proposed (with little supporting data) that prone positioning of obese patients might facilitate a difficult colonoscopy.
aimThe aim of this study was to determine if starting colonoscopy in the prone position for obese patients decreases cecal intubation times.
methodsThis was a prospective, randomized study conducted at the North Texas VA Medical Center. Patients with a body mass index of ≥30 kg/m(2) undergoing elective colonoscopy were randomized 1:1 to either initial prone positioning or standard, left-lateral positioning. The outcome measurements were cecal intubation time, frequency of repositioning, sedative medications used, reports of pain, complications, and procedure tolerability.
resultsFifty patients were randomized to have colonoscopy starting in the standard, left-lateral decubitus position, and 51 to the prone position. The average cecal intubation time for the standard group was 550 vs. 424 s in the prone group (p = 0.03). Patient repositioning was used in 28 % of patients in the standard group versus 8 % in the prone group (p = 0.009). There was no difference in subjective reports of pain between groups (p = 0.95) or in average pain scores (p = 0.79). Follow-up interviews were conducted in 93 % of patients, all of whom said that they would be willing to have repeat colonoscopy in the same position.
conclusionsPerformance of colonoscopy in the prone position for obese patients results in significantly shorter cecal intubation times and decreased need for patient repositioning. Prone positioning is well accepted and does not significantly increase procedure-related discomfort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23143737What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.