Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23143630›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2012

Free circulating tumor DNA as a diagnostic marker for breast cancer.

D Hashad, A Sorour, A Ghazal, I Talaat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review of ctDNA in breast cancer - present utility and future perspectives.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Omics Technologies Improving Breast Cancer Research and Diagnostics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Network approach in liquidomics landscape.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Liquid Biopsy in Solid Malignancy.Genetic testing and molecular biomarkers · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Liquid biopsy for early stage lung cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D HashadClinical Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Azarita, Alexandria, Egypt. doaa_hashad2003@yahoo.com
A Sorour
A Ghazal
I Talaat
Alexandria University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCell-free DNA (cfDNA) in the plasma of patients with both malignant and benign breast lesions was analyzed to determine whether the findings may have diagnostic and prognostic implications and to analyze the association between the levels of cfDNA and prognostic parameters.

methodsPlasma samples were obtained from 99 subjects; 42 with breast cancer (BC), 30 with benign breast lesions, and 27 healthy women as normal controls. Circulatory cfDNA was extracted from the plasma samples and quantified using a real-time quantitative PCR method. Immunohistochemistry was done on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections to evaluate the status of hormonal receptors (estrogen receptor [ER] and progesterone receptor [PR]), and the protein expression of both Her2/neu and Topoisomerase IIα.

resultsThe level of cfDNA in the BC group was significantly higher than in the benign lesions and control groups. cfDNA level was associated with malignant tumor size, lymph node involvement, stage, and grade as well as Her2/neu and Topoisomerase IIα expression, while it was not associated with ER or PR status.

conclusionsThe present study suggests that the level of cfDNA can be easily quantified using plasma samples. Thus, level of plasma cfDNA might constitute an important noninvasive diagnostic and prognostic valuable tool in cancer breast patients' management.

Indexed as

Antigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, NeoplasmDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansNeoplasm StagingReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, NeoplasmDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID23143630
PMCPMC6807470
OpenAlexW1755124267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.