Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23143476›Full record

ArticleInternational immunology2013

Differential localization and function of antibody-forming cells responsive to inactivated or live-attenuated influenza virus vaccines.

Robert Sealy, Richard J Webby, Jeri C Crumpton, Julia L Hurwitz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International immunology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Next-Generation Sequencing Reveals the Progression of COVID-19.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. CD4Vaccine · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Robert SealyDepartment of Infectious Diseases, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, USA.
Richard J Webby
Jeri C Crumpton
Julia L Hurwitz
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
Influence of maternal antibodies on a Sendai virus-vectored RSV vaccineR01AI088729 · NIAID · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI DEVINCENZO, JOHN P., HURWITZ, JULIA L · 2010 to 2014
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA21765NIAID NIH HHS HHSN266200700005CNIAID NIH HHS R01 AI088729NIAID NIH HHS R01AI088729
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, there are two different types of licensed influenza virus vaccines available in the USA, the live attenuated cold-adapted vaccine and the inactivated vaccine. Children greater than 2 years of age and adults younger than 50 years (apart from those suffering from immunodeficiencies or lung disease) may choose between the two vaccines. Previous studies have shown that both vaccines elicit significant serum antibody responses. However, comprehensive analyses of antibody-forming cells (AFCs) in the upper respiratory tract (URT), the critical site of pathogen entry, have been lacking. We therefore compared influenza virus-specific antibody and AFC activities in systemic and mucosal tissues following immunizations of cotton rats with inactivated or live-attenuated vaccines, including vaccines from the 2009-10 and 2010-11 seasons. Results demonstrated that inactivated and live-attenuated vaccines induced virus-specific AFCs, but patterns of residence and function were highly disparate. The inactivated vaccine elicited AFCs predominantly in the spleen and bone marrow; IgG was the main isotype. In contrast, the live attenuated vaccine elicited acute and long-sustained AFC responses in the diffuse nasal-associated lymphoid tissue (d-NALT) and lung, with IgA being the predominant isotype. The appearance of these d-NALT URT responses was confirmed by a similar study of the 2009-10 live attenuated vaccine in ferrets. Data emphasize that the inactivated and live-attenuated vaccines that are each capable of protecting humans from influenza virus disease do so by very different modes of immune surveillance.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnimalsAntibody-Producing CellsAntigens, ViralCell MovementChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfluenza VaccinesMiddle AgedSigmodontinaeVaccines, AttenuatedYoung AdultAntigens, ViralInfluenza VaccinesVaccines, Attenuated

Identifiers

PMID23143476
PMCPMC3579181
OpenAlexW2117483782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.