Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23143292›Full record

ArticleDevelopment genes and evolution2013

The urbilaterian brain revisited: novel insights into old questions from new flatworm clades.

Xavier Bailly, Heinrich Reichert, Volker Hartenstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development genes and evolution, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  5. Genealogical correspondence of a forebrain centre implies an executive brain in the protostome-deuterostome bilaterian ancestor.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
  6. The larval nervous system of the penis worm Priapulus caudatus (Ecdysozoa).Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The evolution of early neurogenesis.Developmental cell · 2015
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xavier BaillyUPMC-CNRS, FR2424, Station Biologique de Roscoff, France. xavier.bailly@sb-roscoff.fr
Heinrich Reichert
Volker Hartenstein

Funding

WORKSHOPS AND TRAININGP41RR017573 · NCRR · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI CARRAGHER, BRIDGET OLIVIA · 2002 to 2011
$14.2M
Lineage-associated wiring properties of Drosphila brain neuronsR01NS054814 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI HARTENSTEIN, VOLKER, LOUIS, MATTHIEU R. P. J. C. G. · 2006 to 2025
$6.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS054814
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flatworms are classically considered to represent the simplest organizational form of all living bilaterians with a true central nervous system. Based on their simple body plans, all flatworms have been traditionally grouped together in a single phylum at the base of the bilaterians. Current molecular phylogenomic studies now split the flatworms into two widely separated clades, the acoelomorph flatworms and the platyhelminth flatworms, such that the last common ancestor of both clades corresponds to the urbilaterian ancestor of all bilaterian animals. Remarkably, recent comparative neuroanatomical analyses of acoelomorphs and platyhelminths show that both of these flatworm groups have complex anterior brains with surprisingly similar basic neuroarchitectures. Taken together, these findings imply that fundamental neuroanatomical features of the brain in the two separate flatworm groups are likely to be primitive and derived from the urbilaterian brain.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainPhylogenyPlatyhelminths

Identifiers

PMID23143292
PMCPMC3873165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.