Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23142302›Full record

Trial reportVaccine2012

Impact of anti-orthopoxvirus neutralizing antibodies induced by a heterologous prime-boost HIV-1 vaccine on insert-specific immune responses.

Stephen R Walsh, Michael S Seaman, Lauren E Grandpre, Cherie Charbonneau, Katherine E Yanosick, Barbara Metch, Michael C Keefer, Raphael Dolin, Lindsey R Baden

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Vaccine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Nonreplicating vectors in HIV vaccines.Current opinion in HIV and AIDS · 2013
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Stephen R WalshDivision of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, United States. srwalsh@bidmc.harvard.edu
Michael S Seaman
Lauren E Grandpre
Cherie Charbonneau
Katherine E Yanosick
Barbara Metch
Michael C Keefer
Raphael Dolin
Lindsey R Baden

Funding

LOC: HIV Vaccine Trials NetworkUM1AI068614 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Dan H. Barouch, Lawrence Corey · 2011 to 2026
$1175.6M
SDMC: HIV Vaccine Trials NetworkUM1AI068635 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Peter B. Gilbert, Yunda Huang · 2011 to 2026
$385.9M
Treatments for Nipah Virus InfectionU54AI057159 · NIAID · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI KASPER, DENNIS L. · 2003 to 2013
$113.7M
Harvard Medical School Vaccine Clinical Trials UnitUM1AI069412 · NIAID · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Lindsey Robert Baden, Daniel R. Kuritzkes · 2012 to 2026
$57.2M
Research Resource Technical Development ComponentU19AI057330 · NIAID · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI REINHERZ, ELLIS L · 2003 to 2009
$19.5M
Dermatotropic cellular immune responses induced by a novel smallpox vaccineK23AI085181 · NIAID · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI WALSH, STEPHEN R · 2010 to 2014
$645k
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI085181NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI057330NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI057159NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068614NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068635NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069412
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impact of anti-vector immunity on the elicitation of insert-specific immune responses is important to understand in vaccine development. HVTN 055 was a 150 person phase I randomized, controlled HIV vaccine trial of recombinant modified vaccinia Ankara (rMVA) and fowlpox (rFPV) with matched HIV-1 inserts which demonstrated increased CD8+ T-cell immune responses in the heterologous vaccine group. The controls used in this study were the empty vectors (MVA and FPV).

methodsAnti-MVA and anti-vaccinia neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) were measured and compared with cellular and humoral HIV-1-specific immune responses.

resultsElicitation of anti-vector responses increased with increasing dose of MVA and up to 2 administrations. Further inoculations of MVA (up to 5) did not increase the magnitude of the anti-MVA response but did delay the anti-vector NAb titre decay. There was no evidence that the insert impaired the anti-vector response, nor that anti-vector immunity attenuated the insert-specific responses.

conclusionTwo doses of MVA may be ideal for the elicitation of orthopoxvirus immune responses with further doses maintaining increased titres against the vector. We found no evidence that eliciting HIV insert- or MVA vector-specific immune responses interfered with elicitation of immune responses to the other.

Indexed as

AIDS VaccinesAntibodies, NeutralizingCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesDouble-Blind MethodEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFowlpox virusHumansOrthopoxvirusAIDS VaccinesAntibodies, Neutralizing

Identifiers

PMID23142302
PMCPMC3566524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.