ArticleGenes2012
Next generation sequence analysis and computational genomics using graphical pipeline workflows.
Article in Genes, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Local data commons: the sleeping beauty in the community of data commons.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Maternal regulation of biliary disease in neonates via gut microbial metabolites.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Three-dimensional self-attention conditional GAN with spectral normalization for multimodal neuroimaging synthesis.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Article
- Global and Regional Changes in Perivascular Space in Idiopathic and Familial Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2021Article
- Volumetric distribution of perivascular space in relation to mild cognitive impairment.Neurobiology of aging · 2021Article
- Imputation Strategy for Reliable Regional MRI Morphological Measurements.Neuroinformatics · 2020Article
- Article
- Improving data workflow systems with cloud services and use of open data for bioinformatics research.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2018Review
- Neuroanatomical morphometric characterization of sex differences in youth using statistical learning.NeuroImage · 2018Article
- Cxcr2 signaling and the microbiome suppress inflammation, bile duct injury, and the phenotype of experimental biliary atresia.PloS one · 2017Article
- systemPipeR: NGS workflow and report generation environment.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- The perfect neuroimaging-genetics-computation storm: collision of petabytes of data, millions of hardware devices and thousands of software tools.Brain imaging and behavior · 2014Article
- Navigating the rapids: the development of regulated next-generation sequencing-based clinical trial assays and companion diagnostics.Frontiers in oncology · 2014Review
- Article
- The struggle to find reliable results in exome sequencing data: filtering out Mendelian errors.Frontiers in genetics · 2014Article
- HIVE-hexagon: high-performance, parallelized sequence alignment for next-generation sequencing data analysis.PloS one · 2014Article
- High-throughput neuroimaging-genetics computational infrastructure.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2014Article
- Design and experimental approach to the construction of a human signal-molecule-profiling database.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2013Article
- Article
- A practical method to detect SNVs and indels from whole genome and exome sequencing data.Scientific reports · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Whole-genome and exome sequencing have already proven to be essential and powerful methods to identify genes responsible for simple Mendelian inherited disorders. These methods can be applied to complex disorders as well, and have been adopted as one of the current mainstream approaches in population genetics. These achievements have been made possible by next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, which require substantial bioinformatics resources to analyze the dense and complex sequence data. The huge analytical burden of data from genome sequencing might be seen as a bottleneck slowing the publication of NGS papers at this time, especially in psychiatric genetics. We review the existing methods for processing NGS data, to place into context the rationale for the design of a computational resource. We describe our method, the Graphical Pipeline for Computational Genomics (GPCG), to perform the computational steps required to analyze NGS data. The GPCG implements flexible workflows for basic sequence alignment, sequence data quality control, single nucleotide polymorphism analysis, copy number variant identification, annotation, and visualization of results. These workflows cover all the analytical steps required for NGS data, from processing the raw reads to variant calling and annotation. The current version of the pipeline is freely available at http://pipeline.loni.ucla.edu. These applications of NGS analysis may gain clinical utility in the near future (e.g., identifying miRNA signatures in diseases) when the bioinformatics approach is made feasible. Taken together, the annotation tools and strategies that have been developed to retrieve information and test hypotheses about the functional role of variants present in the human genome will help to pinpoint the genetic risk factors for psychiatric disorders.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.