ArticlePLoS biology2012
Adaptive evolution and the birth of CTCF binding sites in the Drosophila genome.
Article in PLoS biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evolution of CTCF binding sites in the human genome.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Evolution of Transcript Abundance is Influenced by Indels in Protein Low Complexity Regions.Journal of molecular evolution · 2024Article
- Review
- Widespread contribution of transposable elements to the rewiring of mammalian 3D genomes.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Article
- PhyloPGM: boosting regulatory function prediction accuracy using evolutionary information.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Article
- A universal framework for detectingGenome research · 2021Article
- Topologically associating domains and their role in the evolution of genome structure and function inGenome research · 2021Article
- Mifepristone Increases Life Span of Virgin FemaleFrontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Robust inference of positive selection on regulatory sequences in the human brain.Science advances · 2020Article
- Young genes have distinct gene structure, epigenetic profiles, and transcriptional regulation.Genome research · 2018Article
- DIVERSITY in binding, regulation, and evolution revealed from high-throughput ChIP.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- ChIP-ping the branches of the tree: functional genomics and the evolution of eukaryotic gene regulation.Briefings in functional genomics · 2018Review
- Uncoupling evolutionary changes in DNA sequence, transcription factor occupancy and enhancer activity.eLife · 2017Article
- Evolution of transcript modification byGenome research · 2017Article
- Article
- What Signatures Dominantly Associate with Gene Age?Genome biology and evolution · 2016Article
- Evolution of DNA-Binding Sites of a Floral Master Regulatory Transcription Factor.Molecular biology and evolution · 2016Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Changes in the physical interaction between cis-regulatory DNA sequences and proteins drive the evolution of gene expression. However, it has proven difficult to accurately quantify evolutionary rates of such binding change or to estimate the relative effects of selection and drift in shaping the binding evolution. Here we examine the genome-wide binding of CTCF in four species of Drosophila separated by between ∼2.5 and 25 million years. CTCF is a highly conserved protein known to be associated with insulator sequences in the genomes of human and Drosophila. Although the binding preference for CTCF is highly conserved, we find that CTCF binding itself is highly evolutionarily dynamic and has adaptively evolved. Between species, binding divergence increased linearly with evolutionary distance, and CTCF binding profiles are diverging rapidly at the rate of 2.22% per million years (Myr). At least 89 new CTCF binding sites have originated in the Drosophila melanogaster genome since the most recent common ancestor with Drosophila simulans. Comparing these data to genome sequence data from 37 different strains of Drosophila melanogaster, we detected signatures of selection in both newly gained and evolutionarily conserved binding sites. Newly evolved CTCF binding sites show a significantly stronger signature for positive selection than older sites. Comparative gene expression profiling revealed that expression divergence of genes adjacent to CTCF binding site is significantly associated with the gain and loss of CTCF binding. Further, the birth of new genes is associated with the birth of new CTCF binding sites. Our data indicate that binding of Drosophila CTCF protein has evolved under natural selection, and CTCF binding evolution has shaped both the evolution of gene expression and genome evolution during the birth of new genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.