Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23138872›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2013

Serum-free freezing media support high cell quality and excellent ELISPOT assay performance across a wide variety of different assay protocols.

Helene Filbert, Sebastian Attig, Nicole Bidmon, Bernhard Y Renard, Sylvia Janetzki, Ugur Sahin, Marij J P Welters, Christian Ottensmeier, Sjoerd H van der Burg, Cécile Gouttefangeas and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Helene FilbertIII. Medical Department, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.
Sebastian Attig
Nicole Bidmon
Bernhard Y Renard
Sylvia Janetzki
Ugur Sahin
Marij J P Welters
Christian Ottensmeier
Sjoerd H van der Burg
Cécile Gouttefangeas
Cedrik M Britten
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DELeiden University Medical Center · NLRobert Koch Institute · DEUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robust and sensitive ELISPOT protocols are commonly applied concomitant with the development of new immunotherapeutics. Despite the knowledge that individual serum batches differ in their composition and may change properties over time, serum is still commonly used in immunologic assays. Commercially available serum batches are expensive, limited in quantity and need to be pretested for suitability in immunologic assays, which is a laborious process. The aim of this study was to test whether serum-free freezing media can lead to high cell viability and favorable performance across multiple ELISPOT assay protocols. Thirty-one laboratories from ten countries participated in a proficiency panel organized by the Cancer Immunotherapy Immunoguiding Program to test the influence of different freezing media on cell quality and immunologic function. Each center received peripheral blood mononuclear cells which were frozen in three different media. The participants were asked to quantify antigen-specific CD8+ T-cell responses against model antigens using their locally established IFN-gamma ELISPOT protocols. Self-made and commercially available serum-free freezing media led to higher cell viability and similar cell recovery after thawing and resting compared to freezing media supplemented with human serum. Furthermore, the test performance as determined by (1) background spot production, (2) replicate variation, (3) frequency of detected antigen-specific spots and (4) response detection rate was similar for serum and serum-free conditions. We conclude that defined and accessible serum-free freezing media should be recommended for freezing cells stored for subsequent ELISPOT analysis.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleCell SurvivalCulture Media, Serum-FreeEnzyme-Linked Immunospot AssayEpitopes, T-LymphocyteFreezingHLA-A2 AntigenHumansInterferon-gammaLeukocytes, MononuclearPeptide FragmentsT-LymphocytesCulture Media, Serum-FreeEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHLA-A*02:01 antigenHLA-A2 AntigenInterferon-gammaPeptide Fragments

Identifiers

PMID23138872
PMCPMC3624011
OpenAlexW2105875430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.