ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2012
[Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for necrotizing soft tissue infections: contra].
Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Hyperbaric oxygen therapy decreases mortality due to Fournier's gangrene: a retrospective comparative study.Medical gas researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is discussed as an adjuvant option to treat necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTI). While the Federal Joint Committee decided in 2007 not to support HBOT for the indication necrotizing fasciitis and Fournier's gangrene, it was decided to accept HBOT for treatment of clostridial myonecrosis for the German health insurance. Thus, in Germany necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is not a confirmed indication for HBOT. Against this background the cons of the clinical benefits of HBOT should be formulated.
methodsA literature search (MEDLINE/EMBASE/COCHRANE/manual search) using the keywords "necrotizing fasciitis", "Fournier's gangrene", "necrotizing cellulitis", "necrotizing soft tissue infections" as well as "hyperbaric medicine", "hyperbaric therapy" and "hyperbaric treatment" was carried out. An analysis of the spatial distribution of German hyperbaric oxygen chambers enabling intensive care (HOC-IC) was made.
resultsA total of 250 articles with n=2,556 NSTI patients (n=993 treated by HBOT) was found and 50% of the articles were case reports or series. There were only ten retrospective studies comparing the effects of HBOT with non-HBO treatment and none of them verified the benefit of HBOT in NF patients. In Germany only nine hyperbaric oxygen chambers (HOC-IC) enable intensive care. Currently, patient data are not included in scientific studies or multicenter studies, while studies assessing the benefit with higher evidence levels have been required for more than 15 years.
conclusionsThe previously published human clinical studies do not confirm any therapeutic benefit of HBOT in NF patients. Any time delay in the start of surgical therapy by HBOT would not be acceptable. In Germany a comprehensive clinical care with HOC is not possible. On average the additional costs of HBO treatment for NF patients is approximately 8,000-25,000 <euro>/patient which is not generally reimbursed by health insurance companies. Initializing a register study to assess the benefit of HBOT in NF patients appears feasible and is urgently needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.