Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23138556›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2012

[Prosthesis loosening].

J Schaumburger, S Winkler, M Handel, J Grifka, C Baier

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J SchaumburgerOrthopädische Klinik für die Universität Regensburg, Asklepios Klinikum Bad Abbach, Kaiser-Karl V.-Allee 3, 93077, Bad Abbach, Deutschland. jens.schaumburger@klinik.uni-regensburg.de
S Winkler
M Handel
J Grifka
C Baier
Asklepios Kliniken Bad Abbach · DEUniversity of Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prosthesis loosening is becoming more and more important due to increasing numbers of primary arthroplasty. Especially in patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis this is a major topic due to younger age and multiple affected joints. A carefully performed diagnostic regimen is essential for ruling out septic loosening of the prosthesis. Preoperative planning is crucial for revision surgery. Revision implants should be available as back-up. Revision arthroplasty is a technically and economically demanding procedure. Costs for revision surgery are much higher than for primary arthroplasty due to longer hospital stay, intensive care, microbiology, histology, diagnostic imaging, implants and antibiotics. Revision arthroplasty should be performed in highly specialized centers.

Indexed as

Prosthesis FailureHumansJoint InstabilityJoint ProsthesisOsteoarthritisReoperation

Identifiers

PMID23138556
OpenAlexW3192360259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.