Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23138385›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2013

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for staging liver fibrosis is less reliable in the presence of fat and iron.

Robin Bülow, Birger Mensel, Peter Meffert, Diego Hernando, Matthias Evert, Jens-Peter Kühn

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Liver Fibrosis, Fat, and Iron.Radiologic clinics of North America · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Fat- and iron-corrected ADC to assess liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Gender-specific liver aging and magnetic resonance imaging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Topics on quantitative liver magnetic resonance imaging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Imaging of Hepatic Fibrosis.Current gastroenterology reports · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Robin BülowDepartment of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Ernst Moritz Arndt University of Greifswald, Ferdinand-Sauerbruch-Straße NK, Greifswald 17475, Germany. buelowr@uni-greifswald.de
Birger Mensel
Peter Meffert
Diego Hernando
Matthias Evert
Jens-Peter Kühn

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the reliability of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) for staging liver fibrosis in the presence of fat and iron.

methodsNinety-five patients, including 48 men and 47 women, aged 57.0 ± 14.2 years, underwent liver biopsy. Ninety-six samples were histologically staged for liver fibrosis (0-Ishak score 0; 1-Ishak score 1-4; 2-Ishak score 5-6) and semiquantitatively graded for hepatic iron (0, no; 1, low; 2, moderate; 3, high iron) and for hepatic steatosis. Within 72 h after biopsy, navigator-triggered DW-MRI using b-values of 50/400/800 s/mm(2) was performed in a 1.5-T system, and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) were analysed. ADCs were correlated with fibrosis stage, steatosis grade, and iron grade using linear regression.

resultsADC did not correlate with fibrosis stages in either the overall group (n = 96; R (2) = 0.38; P = 0.17) or in the subgroup without liver iron and steatosis (n = 40; R (2) = 0.01; P = 0.75). ADC decreased significantly with steatosis grade in cases without iron and fibrosis (n = 42; R (2) = 0.28; ß = -5.3; P < 0.001). Liver iron was modestly correlated with ADC in patients without fibrosis and steatosis (n = 33; R (2) = 0.29; P = 0.04), whereas high iron concentrations were associated with low ADC values (group 3: β = -489; P = 0.005; reference:group 0) but intermediate levels were not (group 1/group 2: P = 0.93/P = 0.54; reference group: 0).

conclusionsADC values are confounded by fat and iron. However, even in patients without fat or iron, DW-MRI does not adequately discriminate the stage of fibrosis. KEY POINTS: • Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) is increasingly used to evaluate liver disease. • DWI using b-values of 50/400/800 s/mm (2) does not adequately quantify fibrosis. • Assessment of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) is confounded by fat and iron. • Fat may influence ADCs by altering water diffusion. • Iron may influence ADCs by signal decay and noise floor effects.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFatty LiverFemaleHumansIronLiver CirrhosisMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityIron

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.