ArticleEuropean radiology2013
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for staging liver fibrosis is less reliable in the presence of fat and iron.
Article in European radiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- An empirical explanation of why T2 of tissue and T2 related to field inhomogeneity contribute to the liver apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measure in opposite directions.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Quantitative MR biomarkers in identifying steatohepatitis and fibrosis associated with metabolic dysfunction associated liver disease-a single center cross-sectional study.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- The impacts of time of echo and time of repetition on slow diffusion coefficient (SDC) measure and the potential age- and gender-related variations in liver and spleen SDC values: studies of healthy volunteers.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Non-contrast based approach for liver function quantification using Bayesian-based intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion weighted imaging: A pilot study.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
- Value of multimodal MRI radiomics and machine learning in predicting staging liver fibrosis and grading inflammatory activity.The British journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging in the grading of liver fibrosis associated with congenital ductal plate malformations.Polish journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Liver Fibrosis, Fat, and Iron.Radiologic clinics of North America · 2022Review
- The Efficiency of Fractional Anisotropy, Apparent Diffusion Coefficient, and Contrast Enhancement Index in Liver Fibrosis Staging.Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2022Article
- Fat- and iron-corrected ADC to assess liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2022Article
- Noninvasive evaluation of liver fibrosis: comparison of the stretched exponential diffusion-weighted model to other diffusion-weighted MRI models and transient elastography.European radiology · 2021Article
- Gender-specific liver aging and magnetic resonance imaging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021Article
- Physiological variation of liver iron concentration may not be dominantly responsible for the liver T1rho variations associated with age and gender.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021Article
- Association between liver diffusion-weighted imaging apparent diffusion coefficient values and other measures of liver disease in pediatric autoimmune liver disease patients.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2021Article
- Diffusion-weighted MRI of the liver: challenges and some solutions for the quantification of apparent diffusion coefficient and intravoxel incoherent motion.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Review
- Magnetic Resonance imaging analysis of liver fibrosis and inflammation: overwhelming gray zones restrict clinical use.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2020Review
- Diffusion tensor imaging quantifying the severity of chronic hepatitis in rats.BMC medical imaging · 2020Article
- Topics on quantitative liver magnetic resonance imaging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2019Review
- Liver Fibrosis Assessment with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: Value of Liver Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Normalization Using the Spleen as a Reference Organ.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Imaging of Hepatic Fibrosis.Current gastroenterology reports · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the reliability of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) for staging liver fibrosis in the presence of fat and iron.
methodsNinety-five patients, including 48 men and 47 women, aged 57.0 ± 14.2 years, underwent liver biopsy. Ninety-six samples were histologically staged for liver fibrosis (0-Ishak score 0; 1-Ishak score 1-4; 2-Ishak score 5-6) and semiquantitatively graded for hepatic iron (0, no; 1, low; 2, moderate; 3, high iron) and for hepatic steatosis. Within 72 h after biopsy, navigator-triggered DW-MRI using b-values of 50/400/800 s/mm(2) was performed in a 1.5-T system, and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) were analysed. ADCs were correlated with fibrosis stage, steatosis grade, and iron grade using linear regression.
resultsADC did not correlate with fibrosis stages in either the overall group (n = 96; R (2) = 0.38; P = 0.17) or in the subgroup without liver iron and steatosis (n = 40; R (2) = 0.01; P = 0.75). ADC decreased significantly with steatosis grade in cases without iron and fibrosis (n = 42; R (2) = 0.28; ß = -5.3; P < 0.001). Liver iron was modestly correlated with ADC in patients without fibrosis and steatosis (n = 33; R (2) = 0.29; P = 0.04), whereas high iron concentrations were associated with low ADC values (group 3: β = -489; P = 0.005; reference:group 0) but intermediate levels were not (group 1/group 2: P = 0.93/P = 0.54; reference group: 0).
conclusionsADC values are confounded by fat and iron. However, even in patients without fat or iron, DW-MRI does not adequately discriminate the stage of fibrosis. KEY POINTS: • Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) is increasingly used to evaluate liver disease. • DWI using b-values of 50/400/800 s/mm (2) does not adequately quantify fibrosis. • Assessment of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) is confounded by fat and iron. • Fat may influence ADCs by altering water diffusion. • Iron may influence ADCs by signal decay and noise floor effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23138385What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.