Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23138308›Full record

ReviewNature biotechnology2012

The expanding scope of DNA sequencing.

Jay Shendure, Erez Lieberman Aiden

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature biotechnology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 120 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Phylotranscriptomic analysis ofSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jay ShendureDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. erez@erez.com
Erez Lieberman Aiden

Funding

Exploring how the genome folds through proximity ligation and sequencingDP2OD008540 · OD · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI LIEBERMAN-AIDEN, EREZ · 2011 to 2016
$3.0M
NIH HHS DP2 OD008540
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In just seven years, next-generation technologies have reduced the cost and increased the speed of DNA sequencing by four orders of magnitude, and experiments requiring many millions of sequencing reads are now routine. In research, sequencing is being applied not only to assemble genomes and to investigate the genetic basis of human disease, but also to explore myriad phenomena in organismic and cellular biology. In the clinic, the utility of sequence data is being intensively evaluated in diverse contexts, including reproductive medicine, oncology and infectious disease. A recurrent theme in the development of new sequencing applications is the creative 'recombination' of existing experimental building blocks. However, there remain many potentially high-impact applications of next-generation DNA sequencing that are not yet fully realized.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsForecastingChromosome MappingGenomeRecombination, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID23138308
PMCPMC4149750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.