Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23138033›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2012

Use of varenicline for smoking cessation and risk of serious cardiovascular events: nationwide cohort study.

Henrik Svanström, Björn Pasternak, Anders Hviid

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nicotine receptor partial agonists for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial of varenicline for smokeless tobacco dependence in India.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2014
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Prevention and Treatment of Tobacco Use: JACC Health Promotion Series.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2018
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Evaluation of the cardiovascular effects of varenicline in rats.Drug design, development and therapy · 2015
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Henrik SvanströmDepartment of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institute, 2300 Copenhagen, Denmark. htr@ssi.dk
Björn Pasternak
Anders Hviid
Statens Serum Institut · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate whether varenicline is associated with an increased risk of serious cardiovascular events compared with another drug used for smoking cessation, bupropion.

designNationwide historical cohort study.

settingDenmark, 2007-10.

participantsNew users of varenicline (n = 17,926) and bupropion (n = 17,926).

main outcome measuresIndividual level data on dispensed drug prescriptions, cardiovascular events, and potential confounders were linked between registries. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios of cardiovascular events in analyses matched for propensity score. The primary outcomes at six months after start of treatment were acute coronary syndrome, ischaemic stroke, and cardiovascular death analysed individually and as a composite of any major event.

resultsThere were 57 major cardiovascular events among varenicline users (6.9 cases per 1000 person years) compared with 60 events among bupropion users (7.1 cases per 1000 person years); the hazard ratio for any major event was 0.96 (95% confidence interval 0.67 to 1.39). Varenicline use was not associated with an increased risk of acute coronary syndrome (1.20, 0.75 to 1.91), ischaemic stroke (0.77, 0.40 to 1.48), and cardiovascular death (0.51, 0.13 to 2.02). In subgroup analyses, the risk of any major cardiovascular event was not significantly different between patients with and without a history of cardiovascular disease (1.24 (0.72 to 2.12) and 0.83 (0.51 to 1.36), respectively; P=0.29).

conclusionsThis cohort study found no increased risk of major cardiovascular events associated with use of varenicline compared with bupropion for smoking cessation. On the basis of the upper confidence limit, the data allowed the exclusion of a 40% increased risk of the composite outcome of any major cardiovascular event. While the estimates were less precise for specific outcomes, any differences would be small in absolute terms.

Indexed as

Cause of DeathAcute Coronary SyndromeAdultAgedAge DistributionBenzazepinesBupropionCardiovascular DiseasesCohort StudiesConfidence IntervalsDenmarkDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansIncidenceBenzazepinesBupropionQuinoxalinesVarenicline

Identifiers

PMID23138033
PMCPMC3493624
OpenAlexW2010678915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.