ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2012
What e-patients want from the doctor-patient relationship: content analysis of posts on discussion boards.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- When People With Chronic Conditions Turn to Peers on Social Media to Obtain and Share Information: Systematic Review of the Implications for Relationships With Health Care Professionals.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Pooled it
- The Antecedents and Consequences of Health Care Professional-Patient Online Interactions: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Pooled it
- Personal experiences and emotionality in health-related knowledge exchange in Internet forums: a randomized controlled field experiment comparing responses to facts vs personal experiences.Journal of medical Internet research · 2014Trial
- The GP's a stranger: an interpretive phenomenological analysis exploring patient experiences of changed access to primary care in the management of long-term conditions.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
- Meeting the Burden of Self-management: Qualitative Study Investigating the Empowering Behaviors of Patients and Informal Caregivers.Journal of participatory medicine · 2022Article
- Explore How Online Healthcare Can Influence Willingness to Seek Offline Care.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Breaking up with my idol: A qualitative study of the psychological adaptation process of renouncing fanship.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Patient-Reported Outcomes in a Nationally Representative Sample of Older Internet Users: Cross-sectional Survey.JMIR aging · 2021Article
- Evolutionary Overview of Consumer Health Informatics: Bibliometric Study on the Web of Science from 1999 to 2019.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Review
- Lay perspectives on social distancing and other official recommendations and regulations in the time of COVID-19: a qualitative study of social media posts.BMC public health · 2020Article
- GPs' views of health policy changes: a qualitative 'netnography' study of UK general practice online magazine commentary.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018Article
- Reducing Negative Outcomes of Online Consumer Health Information: Qualitative Interpretive Study with Clinicians, Librarians, and Consumers.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018Article
- Impact of Social Processes in Online Health Communities on Patient Empowerment in Relationship With the Physician: Emergence of Functional and Dysfunctional Empowerment.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017Article
- Article
- Patient perspectives on online health information and communication with doctors: a qualitative study of patients 50 years old and over.Journal of medical Internet research · 2015Article
- Exploring the dimensions of doctor-patient relationship in clinical practice in hospital settings.International journal of health policy and management · 2014Article
- FlexiTerm: a flexible term recognition method.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2013Article
- Portal for Families Overcoming Neurodevelopmental Disorders (PFOND): Implementation of a Software Framework for Facilitated Community Website Creation by Nontechnical Volunteers.JMIR research protocols · 2013Article
- Long-term doctor-patient relationships: patient perspective from online reviews.Journal of medical Internet research · 2013Article
- Background, Structure and Priorities of the 2013 Geneva Declaration on Person-centered Health Research.International journal of person centered medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeople with long-term conditions are encouraged to take control and ownership of managing their condition. Interactions between health care staff and patients become partnerships with sharing of expertise. This has changed the doctor-patient relationship and the division of roles and responsibilities that traditionally existed, but what each party expects from the other may not always be clear. Information that people with long-term conditions share on Internet discussion boards can provide useful insights into their expectations of health care staff. This paper reports on a small study about the expectations that people with a long-term condition (diabetes) have of their doctors using information gleaned from Internet discussion boards.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to ascertain what people with diabetes who use Internet discussion forums want from their doctors. The study objectives were to identify what people with diabetes (1) consider their role in condition management, (2) consider their doctor's role in managing their condition, (3) see as positive elements of their interactions with medical staff, and (4) find problematic in their interactions with medical staff.
methodsThe study used qualitative methodology to explore the experiences, views, and perceptions of individuals participating on 4 Internet message boards. Posts made on the discussion boards were analyzed using the principles of qualitative content analysis. The meanings of sections of data were noted using codes that were developed inductively; those with similar codes were merged into subcategories and related subcategories were combined to form categories.
resultsThe key themes identified in the study were ownership of condition management, power issues between people with long-term conditions and doctors, and ways in which people seek to manage their doctors.
conclusionsPeople with diabetes valued doctors who showed respect for them and their knowledge, and were willing to listen and openly discuss their options. Patients felt that they could and should take responsibility for and control of their day-to-day disease management. They saw doctors as having a role in this process, but when this was lacking, many people felt able to use alternative means to achieve their goal, although the doctor's function in terms of gatekeeping resources could create difficulties for them in this respect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.