Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23137008›Full record

ArticleNutrition and cancer2012

Dietary intake of specific fatty acids and breast cancer risk among postmenopausal women in the VITAL cohort.

Anna K Sczaniecka, Theodore M Brasky, Johanna W Lampe, Ruth E Patterson, Emily White

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition and cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Broadband Collision-Induced Dissociation Mass Spectrometry Imaging.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna K SczanieckaThe Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Cancer Prevention Program, Seattle, Washington 98109-1024, USA.
Theodore M Brasky
Johanna W Lampe
Ruth E Patterson
Emily White
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USCape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa · ZAUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Cancer Prevention Trng-Nutrition, Exercise &GeneticsR25CA094880 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WHITE, EMILY · 2002 to 2016
$7.3M
Established Investigator Award Anti-Inflammatory Exposures in Cancer PreventionK05CA154337 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WHITE, EMILY · 2011 to 2015
$637k
NCI NIH HHS K05 CA154337NCI NIH HHS K05CA154337NCI NIH HHS R25 CA094880NCI NIH HHS R25CA094880
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of dietary fat intake and breast cancer have been inconsistent and few have examined specific fatty acids. We examined the association between specific monounsaturated (MUFA), polyunsaturated (PUFA), saturated (SFA), and trans-fatty acids (TFA) and breast cancer risk. Participants, 50-76 yr, were female members of the VITamins And Lifestyle (VITAL) Cohort, who were postmenopausal at baseline. In 2000-2002, participants completed a food frequency questionnaire. Seven hundred seventy-two incident, primary breast cancer cases were identified using a population-based cancer registry. Cox proportional hazard models estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the association between fatty acid intake and breast cancer risk. Intake of total MUFAs (highest vs. lowest quintile: HR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.08-2.38, P trend = 0.02), particularly myristoleic and erucic acids, was associated with increased breast cancer risk. Whereas total SFA was suggestive of an increased risk (HR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.00-2.15, P trend = 0.09), strong associations were observed for palmitic, margaric, and stearic acids. Total TFA and PUFA intake were not associated with breast cancer. However, among TFAs, linolelaidic acid was positively associated with risk; among PUFAs, intake of eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids were inversely associated with risk. Our findings show that fatty acids are heterogeneous in their association with postmenopausal breast cancer risk.

Indexed as

PostmenopauseAgedBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesDietary FatsDiet RecordsDocosahexaenoic AcidsEicosapentaenoic AcidErucic AcidsFatty AcidsFatty Acids, MonounsaturatedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsProspective Studies9-tetradecenoic acidDietary FatsDocosahexaenoic AcidsEicosapentaenoic Aciderucic acidErucic AcidsFatty AcidsFatty Acids, Monounsaturated

Identifiers

PMID23137008
PMCPMC3633593
OpenAlexW2060908643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.