Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23136169›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental botany2013

Tinkering with meiosis.

Wayne Crismani, Chloé Girard, Raphael Mercier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental botany, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Engineering apomixis in crops.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Intra- and Inter-Specific Crosses amongPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  6. Levels of Heterochiasmy DuringG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Unleashing meiotic crossovers in hybrid plants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  11. FANCM Limits Meiotic Crossovers in Brassica Crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Assessment of Gene Flow BetweenG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wayne CrismaniINRA, UMR1318, Institut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, RD10, F-78000 Versailles, France.
Chloé Girard
Raphael Mercier

Funding

European Research Council 281659
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meiosis is at the heart of Mendelian heredity. Recently, much progress has been made in the understanding of this process, in various organisms. In the last 15 years, the functional characterization of numerous genes involved in meiosis has dramatically deepened our knowledge of key events, including recombination, the cell cycle, and chromosome distribution. Through a constantly advancing tool set and knowledge base, a number of advances have been made that will allow manipulation of meiosis from a plant breeding perspective. This review focuses on the aspects of meiosis that can be tinkered with to create and propagate new varieties. We would like to dedicate this review to the memory of Simon W. Chan (1974-2012) (http://www.plb.ucdavis.edu/labs/srchan/).

Indexed as

MeiosisBreedingCrossing Over, GeneticGerm Cells, PlantPlant CellsRecombination, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID23136169
PMCPMC3711010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.