Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23135170›Full record

ArticleAIDS (London, England)2013

Performance of a fourth-generation HIV screening assay and an alternative HIV diagnostic testing algorithm.

Muazzam Nasrullah, Laura G Wesolowski, William A Meyer, S Michele Owen, Silvina Masciotra, Craig Vorwald, William J Becker, Bernard M Branson

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Performance evaluation of the MedMira reveal G4 LAB S/P and POC HIV antibody rapid screening tests using plasma and whole blood specimens.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2020
    Article
  6. Evaluation of the performance of the Cepheid Xpert HIV-1 Viral Load Assay for quantitative and diagnostic uses.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Management of Newly Diagnosed HIV Infection.Annals of internal medicine · 2017
    Review
  10. Evaluation of dried blood spot protocols with the Bio-Rad GS HIV Combo Ag/Ab EIA and Geenius™ HIV 1/2 Supplemental Assay.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2017
    Article
  11. Performance evaluation of the point-of-care INSTI™ HIV-1/2 antibody test in early and established HIV infections.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2017
    Article
  12. Performance evaluation of the FDA-approved Determine™ HIV-1/2 Ag/Ab Combo assay using plasma and whole blood specimens.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Ten Years of Screening and Testing for Acute HIV Infection in North Carolina.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2016
    Article
  15. Performance evaluation of the CHEMBIO DPP® (dual path platform) HIV-1/2 assay in early and established infections.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2015
    Article
  16. Nucleic acid testing by public health referral laboratories for public health laboratories using the U.S. HIV diagnostic testing algorithm.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Performance of the fourth-generation Bio-Rad GS HIV Combo Ag/Ab enzyme immunoassay for diagnosis of HIV infection in Southern Africa.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Muazzam NasrullahDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV, Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. snasrullah@cdc.gov
Laura G Wesolowski
William A Meyer
S Michele Owen
Silvina Masciotra
Craig Vorwald
William J Becker
Bernard M Branson
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USNational Center for HIV/AIDS Viral Hepatitis STD and TB Prevention · USQuest Diagnostics (United States) · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe evaluated the performance of the GS fourth-generation antigen/antibody assay and compared Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) proposed alternative algorithm [repeatedly reactive fourth-generation immunoassay followed by an HIV-1/HIV-2 differentiation immunoassay and, if needed, nucleic acid test (NAT)] with the current algorithm (repeatedly reactive third-generation immunoassay followed by HIV-1 western blot).

designA convenience sample of the following four specimen sets was acquired: 10 014 from insurance applicants, 493 known western blot-positive, 20 known western blot-indeterminate specimens, and 230 specimens from 26 HIV-1 seroconverters.

methodsSpecimens were tested with the GS third-generation and fourth-generation immunoassays, the Multispot HIV-1/HIV-2 differentiation immunoassay, NAT, and western blot. We applied the two algorithms using these results.

resultsAmong insurance specimens, 13 (0.13%) specimens were immunoassay repeatedly reactive: two were HIV-positive (repeatedly reactive by third-generation and fourth-generation immunoassays, and western blot and Multispot positive); two third-generation repeatedly reactive and nine fourth-generation repeatedly reactive specimens were false-positive. Third-generation and fourth-generation specificities were 99.98% [95% confidence interval (CI) 99.93-100%] and 99.91% (95% CI 99.84-99.96%), respectively.All HIV-1 western blot-positive specimens were repeatedly reactive by third-generation and fourth-generation immunoassays. By Multispot, 491 (99.6%) were HIV-1-positive and two (0.4%) were HIV-2-positive.Only eight (40%) western blot-indeterminate specimens were fourth-generation repeatedly reactive: six were Multispot and NAT-negative and two were Multispot HIV-1-positive but NAT-negative.The alternative algorithm correctly classified as positive 102 seroconverter specimens with the third-generation immunoassay and 130 with the fourth-generation immunoassay compared with 56 using the western blot with either immunoassay.

conclusionThe alternative testing algorithm improved early infection sensitivity and identified HIV-2 infections. Two potential false-positive algorithm results occurred with western blot-indeterminate specimens.

Indexed as

HIV AntibodiesAlgorithmsBlotting, WesternDiagnostic Tests, RoutineHIV-1HIV-2HIV InfectionsHumansImmunoassayMass ScreeningNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesSensitivity and SpecificityHIV Antibodies

Identifiers

PMID23135170
PMCPMC4582659
OpenAlexW2035998598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.