Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23134891›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of clinical nutrition2012

Phosphatidylcholine supplementation in pregnant women consuming moderate-choline diets does not enhance infant cognitive function: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Carol L Cheatham, Barbara Davis Goldman, Leslie M Fischer, Kerry-Ann da Costa, J Steven Reznick, Steven H Zeisel

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Prenatal choline supplementation improves child sustained attention: A 7-year follow-up of a randomized controlled feeding trial.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2022
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carol L CheathamDepartment of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 28081, USA. carol_cheatham@unc.edu
Barbara Davis Goldman
Leslie M Fischer
Kerry-Ann da Costa
J Steven Reznick
Steven H Zeisel
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Zonisamide in Patients with Neuropathic Pain Associated with Diabetic NeuropathyM01RR000046 · NCRR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI JOY, MELANIE S · 1985 to 2008
$38.5M
UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa A. Troester · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CLINICAL NUTRITION RESEARCH UNITP30DK056350 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SUSAN M. SMITH · 1999 to 2026
$31.6M
TIME FRAMES OF CHOLINE ENHANCEMENT OF MEMORYP01AG009525 · NIA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI BLUSZTAJN, JAN KRZYSZTOF · 1991 to 2010
$11.8M
HUMAN REQUIREMENTS FOR THE NUTRIENT CHOLINER01DK055865 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ZEISEL, STEVEN H · 2000 to 2011
$7.6M
NCRR NIH HHS RR00046NIA NIH HHS AG09525NIDDK NIH HHS DK55865NIDDK NIH HHS DK56350NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056350NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCholine is essential for fetal brain development, and it is not known whether a typical American diet contains enough choline to ensure optimal brain development.

objectiveThe study was undertaken to determine whether supplementing pregnant women with phosphatidylcholine (the main dietary source of choline) improves the cognitive abilities of their offspring.

designIn a double-blind, randomized controlled trial, 140 pregnant women were randomly assigned to receive supplemental phosphatidylcholine (750 mg) or a placebo (corn oil) from 18 wk gestation through 90 d postpartum. Their infants (n = 99) were tested for short-term visuospatial memory, long-term episodic memory, language development, and global development at 10 and 12 mo of age.

resultsThe women studied ate diets that delivered ∼360 mg choline/d in foods (∼80% of the recommended intake for pregnant women, 65% of the recommended intake for lactating women). The phosphatidylcholine supplements were well tolerated. Groups did not differ significantly in global development, language development, short-term visuospatial memory, or long-term episodic memory.

conclusionsPhosphatidylcholine supplementation of pregnant women eating diets containing moderate amounts of choline did not enhance their infants' brain function. It is possible that a longer follow-up period would reveal late-emerging effects. Moreover, future studies should determine whether supplementing mothers eating diets much lower in choline content, such as those consumed in several low-income countries, would enhance infant brain development.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentCognitionDietary SupplementsLactationMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaCholine DeficiencyDietDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLanguage DevelopmentMaleMemory, Long-TermMemory, Short-TermNorth CarolinaPhosphatidylcholines

Identifiers

PMID23134891
PMCPMC3497930
OpenAlexW2110596416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.