Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23134728›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012

Disruption of PH-kinase domain interactions leads to oncogenic activation of AKT in human cancers.

Chaitali Parikh, Vasantharajan Janakiraman, Wen-I Wu, Catherine K Foo, Noelyn M Kljavin, Subhra Chaudhuri, Eric Stawiski, Brian Lee, Jie Lin, Hong Li and 17 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. The structural heterogeneity of AKT autoinhibition.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Resistance to Allosteric Inhibitors.Journal of molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. AKT and DUBs: a bidirectional relationship.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2025
    Review
  11. Oncology letters · 2025
    Article
  12. AKT1Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. AKT kinases as therapeutic targets.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Genomic Characterization of Preclinical Prostate Cancer Cell Line Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Chaitali ParikhDepartment of Molecular Biology, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA.
Vasantharajan Janakiraman
Wen-I Wu
Catherine K Foo
Noelyn M Kljavin
Subhra Chaudhuri
Eric Stawiski
Brian Lee
Jie Lin
Hong Li
Maria N Lorenzo
Wenlin Yuan
Joseph Guillory
Marlena Jackson
Jesus Rondon
Yvonne Franke
Krista K Bowman
Meredith Sagolla
Jeremy Stinson
Thomas D Wu
Jiansheng Wu
David Stokoe
Howard M Stern
Barbara J Brandhuber
Kui Lin
Nicholas J Skelton
Somasekar Seshagiri
Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry · UAToxicologie, Pharmacologie et Signalisation Cellulaire · FRArray BioPharma (United States) · USAdvanced Cell Diagnostics (United States) · USGenentech

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The protein kinase v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog (AKT), a key regulator of cell survival and proliferation, is frequently hyperactivated in human cancers. Intramolecular pleckstrin homology (PH) domain-kinase domain (KD) interactions are important in maintaining AKT in an inactive state. AKT activation proceeds after a conformational change that dislodges the PH from the KD. To understand these autoinhibitory interactions, we generated mutations at the PH-KD interface and found that most of them lead to constitutive activation of AKT. Such mutations are likely another mechanism by which activation may occur in human cancers and other diseases. In support of this likelihood, we found somatic mutations in AKT1 at the PH-KD interface that have not been previously described in human cancers. Furthermore, we show that the AKT1 somatic mutants are constitutively active, leading to oncogenic signaling. Additionally, our studies show that the AKT1 mutants are not effectively inhibited by allosteric AKT inhibitors, consistent with the requirement for an intact PH-KD interface for allosteric inhibition. These results have important implications for therapeutic intervention in patients with AKT mutations at the PH-KD interface.

Indexed as

Allosteric RegulationAnimalsCell Line, TumorCell MembraneCell Transformation, NeoplasticEnzyme ActivationHumansMiceModels, MolecularMutant ProteinsMutationNeoplasmsNIH 3T3 CellsOncogenesProtein BindingProtein Kinase InhibitorsMutant ProteinsProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt

Identifiers

PMID23134728
PMCPMC3511101
OpenAlexW2042302972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.