Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23133649›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

A nonintegrative lentiviral vector-based vaccine provides long-term sterile protection against malaria.

Frédéric Coutant, Raul Yusef Sanchez David, Tristan Félix, Aude Boulay, Laxmee Caleechurn, Philippe Souque, Catherine Thouvenot, Catherine Bourgouin, Anne-Sophie Beignon, Pierre Charneau

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Extracellular Vesicles and Their Use as Vehicles of Immunogens.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Viral vector platforms within the gene therapy landscape.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. A Single Dose of NILV-Based Vaccine Provides Rapid and Durable Protection against Zika Virus.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Frédéric CoutantUnité Virologie Moléculaire et Vaccinologie, Department of Virology, Institut Pasteur and CNRS URA3015, Paris, France.
Raul Yusef Sanchez David
Tristan Félix
Aude Boulay
Laxmee Caleechurn
Philippe Souque
Catherine Thouvenot
Catherine Bourgouin
Anne-Sophie Beignon
Pierre Charneau
Department of Virology · FRInstitut Pasteur · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trials testing the RTS,S candidate malaria vaccine and radiation-attenuated sporozoites (RAS) have shown that protective immunity against malaria can be induced and that an effective vaccine is not out of reach. However, longer-term protection and higher protection rates are required to eradicate malaria from the endemic regions. It implies that there is still a need to explore new vaccine strategies. Lentiviral vectors are very potent at inducing strong immunological memory. However their integrative status challenges their safety profile. Eliminating the integration step obviates the risk of insertional oncogenesis. Providing they confer sterile immunity, nonintegrative lentiviral vectors (NILV) hold promise as mass pediatric vaccine by meeting high safety standards. In this study, we have assessed the protective efficacy of NILV against malaria in a robust pre-clinical model. Mice were immunized with NILV encoding Plasmodium yoelii Circumsporozoite Protein (Py CSP) and challenged with sporozoites one month later. In two independent protective efficacy studies, 50% (37.5-62.5) of the animals were fully protected (p = 0.0072 and p = 0.0008 respectively when compared to naive mice). The remaining mice with detectable parasitized red blood cells exhibited a prolonged patency and reduced parasitemia. Moreover, protection was long-lasting with 42.8% sterile protection six months after the last immunization (p = 0.0042). Post-challenge CD8+ T cells to CSP, in contrast to anti-CSP antibodies, were associated with protection (r = -0.6615 and p = 0.0004 between the frequency of IFN-g secreting specific T cells in spleen and parasitemia). However, while NILV and RAS immunizations elicited comparable immunity to CSP, only RAS conferred 100% of sterile protection. Given that a better protection can be anticipated from a multi-antigen vaccine and an optimized vector design, NILV appear as a promising malaria vaccine.

Indexed as

AnimalsEpitopesFemaleGenetic VectorsHEK293 CellsHepatocytesHumansLentivirusMalariaMalaria VaccinesMiceMice, Inbred BALB CModels, GeneticPlasmodium yoeliiProtozoan ProteinsSporozoitescircumsporozoite protein, ProtozoanEpitopesMalaria VaccinesProtozoan Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23133649
PMCPMC3487763
OpenAlexW1963691243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.