Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23133327›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2012

Developing health information literacy: a needs analysis from the perspective of preprofessional health students.

Lana V Ivanitskaya, Kaitlyn A Hanisko, Julie A Garrison, Samantha J Janson, Danielle Vibbert

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Improving instruction in medical libraries: the research agenda.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lana V IvanitskayaSchool of Health Sciences, Michigan University, HPB 1205, Mount Pleasant, MI 48859, USA. ivani1sv@cmich.edu
Kaitlyn A Hanisko
Julie A Garrison
Samantha J Janson
Danielle Vibbert
Central Michigan University · USGrand Valley State University · US

Funding

Assessing Health Information Consumers' Competencies in Managing Digital Media: AR03ES017401 · NIEHS · CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY · PI IVANITSKAYA, SVETLANA · 2009 to 2010
$209k
NIEHS NIH HHS R03ES017401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe research identified the skills, if any, that health preprofessional students wished to develop after receiving feedback on skill gaps as well as any strategies they intended to use to address these gaps.

methodsA qualitative approach was used to elicit students' reflections on building health information literacy skills. First, the students took the Research Readiness Self-Assessment instrument, which measured their health information literacy, and then they received individually tailored feedback about their scores and skill gaps. Second, students completed a post-assessment survey asking how they intended to close identified gaps in their skills on these. Three trained coders analyzed qualitative comments by 181 students and grouped them into themes relating to "what skills to improve" and "how to improve them."

resultsStudents intended to develop library skills (64% of respondents), Internet skills (63%), and information evaluation skills (63%). Most students reported that they would use library staff members' assistance (55%), but even more respondents (82%) planned to learn the skills by practicing on their own. Getting help from librarians was a much more popular learning strategy than getting assistance from peers (20%) or professors (17%).

conclusionsThe study highlighted the importance of providing health preprofessional students with resources to improve skills on their own, remote access to library staff members, and instruction on the complexity of building health literacy skills, while also building relationships among students, librarians, and faculty.

Indexed as

Information LiteracyInformation Seeking BehaviorNeeds AssessmentAllied Health PersonnelComputer-Assisted InstructionHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalLibrary ServicesSelf-Evaluation ProgramsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID23133327
PMCPMC3484940
OpenAlexW2001878979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.