ArticleThe Indian journal of surgery2007
Immunosuppression strategies after liver transplantation: a single centre experience in 57 liver transplant recipients.
Article in The Indian journal of surgery, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextThe art of administering immunosuppression lies in the ability to achieve a delicate balance between rejection and infection, thus maximizing patient survival and minimizing morbidity.
aimsTo analyze the effect of immunosuppression strategies following liver transplant on the incidence of acute rejection, bile leak, renal dysfunction and posttransplant graft unrelated infection. SETTINGS AND
designA retrospective analysis of immunosuppression regimens in 57 liver transplant recipients between Jan 1998 to July 2004 at a single institution. METHODS AND MATERIAL: For the purpose of study, the patients were divided into two groups: A - Cyclosporine based therapy (n=37), and B - Tacrolimus based therapy (n=20). In addition, both groups received Azathioprine or Mycophenolate mofetil with steroids. There were two subgroups in each Group A and B: Group C - Received induction using IL2Rab (n=5), and D - Where Sirolimus was used instead of Mycophenolate mofetil (N=7). The subgroups were equally distributed among the basic groups. The regimen was started based on one of the standard protocols but changes were made according to the clinical status of each patient. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The statistical analysis was done using Chi square test on SPSS12.
resultsA lower incidence of rejection was observed in Tacrolimus group compared to Cyclosporine group. There was an unacceptably high incidence of bile leak in patients where Sirolimus was used as an adjunct. IL2Rab enabled us to maintain a lower trough level of Tacrolimus for maintenance and enabled us to discontinue steroids earlier.
conclusionsBased on this study we dropped Sirolimus from our immunosuppression protocol and the encouraging results obtained with tacrolimus based therapy have supported its use as standard therapy in our immunosuppression regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.