ArticleMedical care research and review : MCRR2013
Incorporating patients' preferences into medical decision making.
Article in Medical care research and review : MCRR, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Using discrete choice experiments to develop and deliver patient-centered psychological interventions: a systematic review.Health psychology review · 2021Pooled it
- Do Decision Aids Benefit Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain? A Systematic Review.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2020Pooled it
- Patient Preferences for Breast Cancer Treatment Interventions: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.The patient · 2019Pooled it
- Individual Value Clarification Methods Based on Conjoint Analysis: A Systematic Review of Common Practice in Task Design, Statistical Analysis, and Presentation of Results.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2018Pooled it
- The Diabetes Telephone Study: Design and challenges of a pragmatic cluster randomized trial to improve diabetic peripheral neuropathy treatment.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2016Trial
- Trial
- Mental health needs of patients with osteoarthritis based on a preference perspective: a mixed-methods study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Development of an AI chatbot to support shared decision-making in rheumatoid arthritis: a two-phase usability study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Article
- Best-Worst Scaling Survey of Inpatients' Preferences in Medical Decision-Making Participation in China.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- What influences slum residents' choices of healthcare providers for common illnesses? Findings of a Discrete Choice Experiment in Ibadan, Nigeria.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- Effectiveness of a Community Health Worker-Led Intervention on Knowledge, Perception, and Prostate Cancer Screening among Men in Rural Kenya.Advances in preventive medicine · 2022Article
- Goal attainment scaling for patients with low back pain in rehabilitation: A systematic review.Health science reports · 2021Review
- Feasibility, Validity and Differences in Adolescent and Adult EQ-5D-Y Health State Valuation in Australia and Spain: An Application of Best-Worst Scaling.PharmacoEconomics · 2020Article
- Determinants Used to Justify the Strength of Recommendations among Korean Clinical Practice Guidelines.Journal of Korean medical science · 2018Article
- Article
- Knowledge of Prostate Cancer and Screening Among Young Multiethnic Black Men.American journal of men's health · 2017Article
- Patient Preferences and Surrogate Decision Making in Neuroscience Intensive Care Units.Neurocritical care · 2015Review
- A model to support shared decision making in electronic health records systems.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2014Article
- Why should regulators consider using patient preferences in benefit-risk assessment?PharmacoEconomics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Current models of care emphasize the importance of including patients' values in the decision-making process. This is particularly important for decisions for which there are few data supporting a clear strategy or treatment choice. Constructing preferences for complex decisions requires that patients be able to consider multiple trade-offs between specific risks and benefits. Several marketing research techniques have been recently applied to heath care settings to facilitate this process. Most can be programmed to generate patients' preferences or priorities, which can then be used to improve patient-physician communication. In this article, we will describe some of the currently available approaches that have been successfully used in the health care setting. We provide case examples to illustrate the potential value of adopting each of these approaches in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.