Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23132685›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater2012

[Motivational interviewing in psychiatry].

Sergei Mechtcheriakov, Maria Rettenbacher

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sergei MechtcheriakovDepartment Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinik für Biologische Psychiatrie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Österreich, s.mechtcheriakov@i-med.ac.at.
Maria Rettenbacher

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivational Interviewing and associated communication techniques and intervention methods have been widely applied in patients with substance use disorder and other psychiatric disorders in the last twenty years. Intensive research on effectiveness and underlying mechanisms as well as the increasing efforts to apply MI in other psychiatric disorders has lead to a large number of scientific publications in this field. MI has been shown to be effective in situations where the patient's ambivalence seems to impede the therapeutic process. Communication skills and the ability of the care taker to induce the so called "change talk" by the patient play a particularly important role and correlate with the positive effects of MI. Those groups of patients in which other factors than ambivalence affect the therapeutic process seem to benefit much less from this intervention method. MI hallmarks the substantial change that gradually took place during the last two decades in caretakers' attitude towards patients with dependence and other psychiatric patients: away from "prescriptive" towards "supportive" treatment and communication style. Therefore, it seems to be reasonable to implement the basics of MG in the training curricula for psychiatrists.

Indexed as

Motivational InterviewingPsychiatryCommunicationHumansMotivationSubstance-Related Disorders

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.