ArticleLung2013
A method for determining optimal mean airway pressure in high-frequency oscillatory ventilation.
Article in Lung, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Efficacy of volume-targeted ventilation versus high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2022Article
- The Physiological Basis of High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation and Current Evidence in Adults and Children: A Narrative Review.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Review
- Change in End-Expiratory Lung Volume During Sleep in Patients at Risk for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background"Optimal" mean airway pressure (MAP) during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) can be defined as the pressure that allows for maximal alveolar recruitment while minimizing alveolar overdistension. Choosing a MAP near or just below the point of maximal curvature (PMC) of the volume-pressure characteristics of the lung can serve as a guide to avoid overdistention during HFOV, while simultaneously preventing derecruitment. The purpose of this study was to assess whether optimal MAP at the PMC can be determined by using measures of PaO(2) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) undergoing HFOV.
methodsWe prospectively studied seven patients with ARDS who underwent HFOV after failed conventional ventilation. In addition, 11 healthy subjects were studied to validate measurements of changes in end-expiratory lung volume (∆EELV) using magnetometers. Using this validated method, plots of ∆EELV and MAP were constructed during decremental changes in MAP following a recruitment maneuver in seven ventilated patients with ARDS. The PMC was defined as the point where the slope of the ∆EELV versus MAP curve acutely changed. The MAP at the PMC was compared to that determined from plots of PaO(2) versus MAP.
resultsIn the healthy cohort, measurements of ∆EELV obtained by magnetometry approximated the line of identity when compared to those obtained by spirometry. The MAP determined using either the ∆EELV or PaO(2) techniques were identical in all seven HFOV ventilated patients. Additionally, there was a significant correlation between the MAP associated changes in PaO2 and the MAP associated changes in ∆EELV (p < 0.001).
conclusionsThe finding that MAP at the PMC is the same whether determined by measures of ∆EELV or PaO(2) suggest that bedside measures PaO(2) may provide an acceptable surrogate for measures of EELV when determining "optimal" MAP during HFOV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23132266What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.