Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23131664›Full record

ReviewTranscription

Genomic occupancy of the transcriptional co-activators p300 and CBP.

Per-Henrik Holmqvist, Mattias Mannervik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transcription. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. NFE2L1/Nrf1 forms a coactivator complex post-peptide:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Cell-specific expression of theFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Per-Henrik HolmqvistThe Wenner-Gren Institute, Developmental Biology, Stockholm University, Arrheniuslaboratories E3, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
Mattias Mannervik

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The p300 and CBP co-activators are histone acetylases and central regulators of transcription in metazoans. The genomic occupancy of p300/CBP detected by ChIP-seq experiments can be used to identify transcriptional enhancers. However, studies in Drosophila embryos suggest that there is a preference for some transcription factors in directing p300/CBP to the genome. Although p300/CBP occupancy in general correlates with gene activation, they can also be found at silent genomic regions, which does not result in histone acetylation. Polycomb-mediated H3K27me3 is associated with repression, but does not preclude p300/CBP binding. An antagonism between H3K27ac and H3K27me3 indicates that p300/CBP may be involved in switching between repressed and active chromatin states.

Indexed as

GenomeAcetylationAnimalsCREB-Binding ProteinE1A-Associated p300 ProteinEnhancer Elements, GeneticGene Expression RegulationGene SilencingHistonesHumansPolycomb-Group ProteinsProtein BindingRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidTranscriptional ActivationCREB-Binding ProteinE1A-Associated p300 ProteinHistonesPolycomb-Group ProteinsCBPChIP-seqenhancerp300Polycombtranscription

Identifiers

PMID23131664
PMCPMC3644037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.