Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23131088›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of audiology2013

The future role of genetic screening to detect newborns at risk of childhood-onset hearing loss.

Luan Linden Phillips, Maria Bitner-Glindzicz, Nicholas Lench, Karen P Steel, Cordelia Langford, Sally J Dawson, Adrian Davis, Sue Simpson, Claire Packer

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of audiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Various aspects of hearing loss in newborns: A narrative review.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Nationwide population genetic screening improves outcomes of newborn screening for hearing loss in China.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Monitoring neonates for ototoxicity.International journal of audiology · 2018
    Review
  10. Newborn genetic screening for hearing impairment: a population-based longitudinal study.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Early investigational drugs for hearing loss.Expert opinion on investigational drugs · 2015
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Etiology of early hearing loss in Brazilian children.Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Luan Linden PhillipsNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Horizon Scanning Centre, School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. l.p.linden@bham.ac.uk
Maria Bitner-Glindzicz
Nicholas Lench
Karen P Steel
Cordelia Langford
Sally J Dawson
Adrian Davis
Sue Simpson
Claire Packer
National Institute for Health Research · GBUniversity College London · GBWellcome Sanger Institute · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council G0300212Medical Research Council MC_QA137918Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 091092/Z/09/ZWellcome Trust 098051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the future potential of genetic screening to detect newborns at risk of childhood-onset hearing loss.

designAn expert led discussion of current and future developments in genetic technology and the knowledge base of genetic hearing loss to determine the viability of genetic screening and the implications for screening policy. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Despite increasing pressure to adopt genetic technologies, a major barrier for genetic screening in hearing loss is the uncertain clinical significance of the identified mutations and their interactions. Only when a reliable estimate of the future risk of hearing loss can be made at a reasonable cost, will genetic screening become viable. Given the speed of technological advancement this may be within the next 10 years. Decision-makers should start to consider how genetic screening could augment current screening programmes as well as the associated data processing and storage requirements.

conclusionIn the interim, we suggest that decision makers consider the benefits of (1) genetically testing all newborns and children with hearing loss, to determine aetiology and to increase knowledge of the genetic causes of hearing loss, and (2) consider screening pregnant women for the m.1555A> G mutation to reduce the risk of aminoglycoside antibiotic-associated hearing loss.

Indexed as

DNA Mutational AnalysisGenetic TestingAge of OnsetDiffusion of InnovationFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHearing LossHeredityHumansInfant, NewbornKnowledge BasesNeonatal ScreeningPedigreePhenotypePredictive Value of TestsPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID23131088
PMCPMC3545543
OpenAlexW2158866073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.