Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23129628›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012

Estimating divergence times in large molecular phylogenies.

Koichiro Tamura, Fabia Ursula Battistuzzi, Paul Billing-Ross, Oscar Murillo, Alan Filipski, Sudhir Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 323 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
323citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

323 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

263 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Koichiro TamuraDepartment of Biological Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo 192-0397, Japan.
Fabia Ursula Battistuzzi
Paul Billing-Ross
Oscar Murillo
Alan Filipski
Sudhir Kumar

Funding

COMPARATIVE MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANALYSISR01HG002096 · NHGRI · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI KUMAR, SUDHIR · 2000 to 2013
$3.0M
Graduate and Undergraduate Training in Biomedicine at ASUR25GM099650 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI NEWFELD, STUART J · 2012 to 2015
$2.2M
A phylogenetic approach to metagenomic analysisR21HG006039 · NHGRI · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI FILIPSKI, ALAN · 2011 to 2012
$419k
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002096NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002096-11NHGRI NIH HHS R21 HG006039NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM099650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular dating of species divergences has become an important means to add a temporal dimension to the Tree of Life. Increasingly larger datasets encompassing greater taxonomic diversity are becoming available to generate molecular timetrees by using sophisticated methods that model rate variation among lineages. However, the practical application of these methods is challenging because of the exorbitant calculation times required by current methods for contemporary data sizes, the difficulty in correctly modeling the rate heterogeneity in highly diverse taxonomic groups, and the lack of reliable clock calibrations and their uncertainty distributions for most groups of species. Here, we present a method that estimates relative times of divergences for all branching points (nodes) in very large phylogenetic trees without assuming a specific model for lineage rate variation or specifying any clock calibrations. The method (RelTime) performed better than existing methods when applied to very large computer simulated datasets where evolutionary rates were varied extensively among lineages by following autocorrelated and uncorrelated models. On average, RelTime completed calculations 1,000 times faster than the fastest Bayesian method, with even greater speed difference for larger number of sequences. This speed and accuracy will enable molecular dating analysis of very large datasets. Relative time estimates will be useful for determining the relative ordering and spacing of speciation events, identifying lineages with significantly slower or faster evolutionary rates, diagnosing the effect of selected calibrations on absolute divergence times, and estimating absolute times of divergence when highly reliable calibration points are available.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenetic VariationPhylogenyComputer SimulationDatabases, GeneticTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID23129628
PMCPMC3511068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.