ArticleRheumatology international2013
Early diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis: an introduction to the newly designed Iran criteria for ankylosing spondylitis.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
More than 14 years of clinical practice in rheumatology led the author to develop his experience-based criteria for early ankylosing spondylitis (AS) diagnosis. This study aims to introduce this new set of criteria, Iran criteria for ankylosing spondylitis, and to assess its sensitivity in comparison with 1984 modified New York criteria. A cost-effective diagnostic approach towards AS diagnosis is also proposed. The criteria score the patients according to the findings in history and physical examination, imagings and HLA-B27 testing. Sensitivity analysis was performed in a retrospective manner after reviewing the medical records of 120 patients at the outpatient Rheumatology Clinic of the author (private sector), regarding clinical diagnosis by a single rheumatologist as the gold standard. The sensitivity was separately measured for disease durations of 2, 2-5, 5-10 and more than 10 years. Iran criteria for AS recorded a sensitivity of 100 % in all disease durations. However, the sensitivity of 1984 modified New York criteria was 48.39 % in early stages of the disease and increased to 92.10 % for disease duration of more than 10 years. Iran criteria for AS provide a highly sensitive instrument for detecting AS in its early and late, clinical and subclinical, radiographic and pre-radiographic stages as well as atypical forms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23129429What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.