Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23129391›Full record

ReviewNeuropsychology review2013

Effects of cannabis on neurocognitive functioning: recent advances, neurodevelopmental influences, and sex differences.

Natania A Crane, Randi Melissa Schuster, Paolo Fusar-Poli, Raul Gonzalez

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropsychology review, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 178 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
178citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

178 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 307 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

118 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Natania A CraneDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Randi Melissa Schuster
Paolo Fusar-Poli
Raul Gonzalez
University of Illinois Chicago · USFlorida International University · USKing's College London · GB

Funding

The joint effect of neighborhood-level factors and decision-making on changes in cannibis useR01DA031176 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI GONZALEZ, RAUL · 2012 to 2017
$2.3M
The Impact of Cannabis Use on the Neurocognitive Functioning of Individuals withR01DA033156 · NIDA · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI GONZALEZ, RAUL · 2012 to 2017
$2.2M
Neurocognitive Disinhibition and Cannabis Addiction: A Career Development AwardK23DA023560 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI GONZALEZ, RAUL · 2008 to 2010
$487k
A Situational Examination of Neurocognition and Affect with Simultaneous CannabisF31DA032244 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI SCHUSTER, RANDI MELISSA · 2011 to 2013
$126k
NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA032244NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA032244-01NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA023560NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA031176NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA033156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decades of research have examined the effects of cannabis on neurocognition. Recent advances in this field provide us with a better understanding of how cannabis use influences neurocognition both acutely (during intoxication) and non-acutely (after acute effects subside). Evidence of problems with episodic memory is one of the most consistent findings reported; however, several other neurocognitive domains appear to be adversely affected by cannabis use under various conditions. There is significant variability in findings across studies, thus a discussion of potential moderators is increasingly relevant. The purpose of this review was to 1) provide an update on research of cannabis' acute and non-acute effects on neurocognition, with a focus on findings since 2007 and 2) suggest and discuss how neurodevelopmental issues and sex differences may influence cannabis effects on neurocognition. Finally we discuss how future investigations may lead to better understanding of the complex interplay among cannabis, stages of neurodevelopment, and sex on neurocognitive functioning.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAnimalsAttentionCannabidiolCognition DisordersDecision MakingFemaleHumansLearningMaleMarijuana AbuseMemoryRetrospective StudiesCannabidiol

Identifiers

PMID23129391
PMCPMC3593817
OpenAlexW2059436903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.