Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23128984›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of membrane biology2013

A theoretical study of single-cell electroporation in a microchannel.

Saeid Movahed, Dongqing Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of membrane biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Saeid MovahedDepartment of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
Dongqing Li

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electroporation of a single cell in a microchannel was studied. The effects of electrical (e.g., strength of the electric pulse) and geometrical (e.g., microchannel height, electrode size and position) parameters on cell membrane permeabilization were investigated. The electrodes were assumed to be embedded in the walls of the microchannel; the cell was suspended between these two electrodes. By keeping the electric pulse constant, increasing the microchannel height reduces the number and the radius of the biggest nanopores, as well as the electroporated area of the cell membrane. If the width of the electrodes is bigger than the cell diameter, the transmembrane potential will be centralized and have a sinusoidal distribution around the cell if nanopores are not generated. As the width of the electrode decreases and becomes smaller than the cell diameter, the local transmembrane potential decreases; in the nonelectroporative area, the transmembrane potential distribution deviates from the sinusoidal behavior; the induced transmembrane potential also concentrates around the poles of the cell membrane (the nearest points of the cell membrane to the electrodes). During cell membrane permeabilization, the biggest nanopores are initially created at the poles and then the nanopore population expands toward the equator. The number of the created nanopores reaches its maximal value within a few microseconds; further presence of the electric pulse may not influence the number and location of the created nanopores anymore but will develop the generated nanopores. Strengthening the electric pulse intensifies the size and number of the created nanopores as well as the electroporated area on the cell membrane.

Indexed as

ElectroporationModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.