ArticleNeuroImage2013
Dynamic causal modelling of lateral interactions in the visual cortex.
Article in NeuroImage, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Topographic Variation in Human Neurotransmitter Receptor Densities Explains Differences in Intracranial EEG Spectra.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Effective connectivity predicts distributed neural coding of perceptual decision confidence, uncertainty, and speed.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Individual/Peak Gamma Frequency: What Do We Know?Brain sciences · 2023Review
- New Therapeutics in Alzheimer's Disease Longitudinal Cohort study (NTAD): study protocol.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Dynamic causal modelling shows a prominent role of local inhibition in alpha power modulation in higher visual cortex.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Can the causal role of brain oscillations be studied through rhythmic brain stimulation?Journal of vision · 2021Article
- Tiagabine induced modulation of oscillatory connectivity and activity match PET-derived, canonical GABA-A receptor distributions.European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021Article
- Differences in visually induced MEG oscillations reflect differences in deep cortical layer activity.Communications biology · 2020Article
- Bayesian Modelling of Induced Responses and Neuronal Rhythms.Brain topography · 2019Article
- Working Memory Load Modulates Neuronal Coupling.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2019Article
- Not All Predictions Are Equal: "What" and "When" Predictions Modulate Activity in Auditory Cortex through Different Mechanisms.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018Article
- Neurophysiologically-informed markers of individual variability and pharmacological manipulation of human cortical gamma.NeuroImage · 2017Article
- The Cumulative Effects of Predictability on Synaptic Gain in the Auditory Processing Stream.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017Article
- Abnormal frontoparietal synaptic gain mediating the P300 in patients with psychotic disorder and their unaffected relatives.Human brain mapping · 2017Article
- Expectation violation and attention to pain jointly modulate neural gain in somatosensory cortex.NeuroImage · 2017Article
- Linking canonical microcircuits and neuronal activity: Dynamic causal modelling of laminar recordings.NeuroImage · 2017Article
- Article
- Neuronal interactions between mentalising and action systems during indirect request processing.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2016Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This paper presents a dynamic causal model based upon neural field models of the Amari type. We consider the application of these models to non-invasive data, with a special focus on the mapping from source activity on the cortical surface to a single channel. We introduce a neural field model based upon the canonical microcircuit (CMC), in which neuronal populations are assigned to different cortical layers. We show that DCM can disambiguate between alternative (neural mass and field) models of cortical activity. However, unlike neural mass models, DCM with neural fields can address questions about neuronal microcircuitry and lateral interactions. This is because they are equipped with interlaminar connections and horizontal intra-laminar connections that are patchy in nature. These horizontal or lateral connections can be regarded as connecting macrocolumns with similar feature selectivity. Crucially, the spatial parameters governing horizontal connectivity determine the separation (width) of cortical macrocolumns. Thus we can estimate the width of macro columns, using non-invasive electromagnetic signals. We illustrate this estimation using dynamic causal models of steady-state or ongoing spectral activity measured using magnetoencephalography (MEG) in human visual cortex. Specifically, we revisit the hypothesis that the size of a macrocolumn is a key determinant of neuronal dynamics, particularly the peak gamma frequency. We are able to show a correlation, over subjects, between columnar size and peak gamma frequency - that fits comfortably with established correlations between peak gamma frequency and the size of visual cortex defined retinotopically. We also considered cortical excitability and assessed its relative influence on observed gamma activity. This example highlights the potential utility of dynamic causal modelling and neural fields in providing quantitative characterisations of spatially extended dynamics on the cortical surface - that are parameterised in terms of horizontal connections, implicit in the cortical micro-architecture and its synaptic parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.