ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2013
Population pharmacokinetics of abacavir in infants, toddlers and children.
Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dose rationale and pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine in mechanically ventilated new-borns: impact of design optimisation.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019Trial
- Population pharmacokinetics of abacavir and lamivudine in severely malnourished human immunodeficiency virus-infected children in relation to treatment outcomes.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019Trial
- The Finite Absorption Time Concept Guiding Model Informed Drug & Generics Development in Clinical Pharmacology.Pharmaceutical research · 2025Review
- Abacavir Drug Exposures in African Children Under 14 kg Using Pediatric Solid Fixed Dose Combinations According to World Health Organization Weight Bands.Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society · 2023Article
- Paediatric medicine issues and gaps from healthcare workers point of view: survey results and a narrative review from the global accelerator for paediatric formulations project.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Abacavir pharmacokinetics in African children living with HIV: A pooled analysis describing the effects of age, malnutrition and common concomitant medications.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022Article
- Pharmacokinetics and Drug-Drug Interactions of Abacavir and Lamuvudine Co-administered With Antituberculosis Drugs in HIV-Positive Children Treated for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Abacavir Exposure in Children Cotreated for Tuberculosis with Rifampin and Superboosted Lopinavir-Ritonavir.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020Article
- Population pharmacokinetics of ciclosporin in Chinese children with aplastic anemia: effects of weight, renal function and stanozolol administration.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo characterize the pharmacokinetics of abacavir in infants, toddlers and children and to assess the influence of covariates on drug disposition across these populations.
methodsAbacavir concentration data from three clinical studies in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children (n = 69) were used for model building. The children received either a weight-normalized dose of 16 mg kg(-1) day(-1) or the World Health Organization recommended dose based on weight bands. A population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using nonlinear mixed effects modelling VI. The influence of age, gender, bodyweight and formulation was evaluated. The final model was selected according to graphical and statistical criteria.
resultsA two-compartmental model with first-order absorption and first-order elimination best described the pharmacokinetics of abacavir. Bodyweight was identified as significant covariate influencing the apparent oral clearance and volume of distribution. Predicted steady-state maximal plasma concentration and area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h of the standard twice daily regimen were 2.5 mg l(-1) and 6.1 mg h l(-1) for toddlers and infants, and 3.6 mg l(-1) and 8.7 mg h l(-1) for children, respectively. Model-based predictions showed that equivalent systemic exposure was achieved after once and twice daily dosing regimens. There were no pharmacokinetic differences between the two formulations (tablet and solution). The model demonstrated good predictive performance for dosing prediction in individual patients and, as such, can be used to support therapeutic drug monitoring in conjunction with sparse sampling.
conclusionsThe disposition of abacavir in children appears to be affected only by differences in size, irrespective of the patient's age. Maturation processes of abacavir metabolism in younger infants should be evaluated in further studies to demonstrate the potential impact of ontogeny.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.