Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23126271›Full record

SynthesisBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2013

Timing of administration of prophylactic antibiotics for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

H Baaqeel, R Baaqeel

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04697277 (The Effect of Antibiotic Prophylaxis Timing on Intraoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section Under Regional Anesthesia.), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04697277 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Antibiotic Prophylaxis Timing on Intraoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section Under Regional Anesthesia.

TypeinterventionalSponsorBaskent University Ankara HospitalRan2015 to 2021Enrolled120ConditionsIntraoperative Nausea-retching-vomiting Episodes, Nausea Scores Will be Evaluated on the Verbal Analog Scale (VAS)ArmsAntibiotic prophylaxis timing (before skin incision and after cord clamping) for caesarean section
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Antibiotic regimens for management of intra-amniotic infection.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Perinatal pharmacokinetics of azithromycin for cesarean prophylaxis.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2015
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Cesarean delivery volume and risk of long-term neurodevelopmental disorders in offspring.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

H BaaqeelCollege of Medicine-Jeddah, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences and Department of OB/GYN, King Abdulaziz Medical City-WR, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. baaqeelhs@ngha.med.sa
R Baaqeel
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences · SAWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProphylactic antibiotics reduce infectious morbidity from caesarean section. The timing of their administration, however, is a matter of controversy.

objectivesTo examine maternal and neonatal infectious morbidity in women receiving preoperative prophylaxis compared with those receiving intraoperative administration. SEARCH STRATEGY: Medline, Embase, Current Controlled Trials and Cochrane Central were searched from their inception dates to December 2011. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of a single dose of any antibiotic comparing preoperative with intraoperative administration were selected. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial characteristics, outcomes and quality measures, based on the Cochrane tool for risk of bias, were independently extracted. The random effect model of DerSimonian and Laird to estimate relative risks (RRs) for maternal and neonatal outcomes was used. MAIN

resultsSix trials met the inclusion criteria, reporting on 2313 women and 2345 newborns. Preoperative administration was associated with a significant 41% reduction in the rate of endometritis compared with intraoperative administration (RR 0.59; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.37-0.94; I2 0%). In the preoperative group, there were nonsignificant reductions in the rates of wound infection (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.44-1.14; I2 0%), maternal febrile morbidity (RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.46-1.95; I2 0%), neonatal sepsis (RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.47-1.41; I2 0%), neonatal septic work-up (RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.71-1.21; I2 0%) and neonatal intensive-care unit admission (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.65-1.28; I2 0%). There were nonsignificant increases in the rates of maternal pyelonephritis (RR 1.09; 95% CI 0.49-2.43; I2 0%) and neonatal pneumonia (RR 3.36; 95% CI 0.55-20.47; I2 0%).

conclusionsCompared with intraoperative administration, preoperative antibiotics significantly reduce the rate of endometritis. The lack of neonatal adverse effects should be cautiously interpreted given the limited power of the trials to detect such effects.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisCesarean SectionFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfectionsPostoperative ComplicationsPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTime FactorsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID23126271
PMCPMC3654161
OpenAlexW2107116490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.