Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23125437›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2013

The emergency department action in smoking cessation (EDASC) trial: impact on cessation outcomes.

David A Katz, John E Holman, Andrew S Nugent, Laurence J Baker, Skyler R Johnson, Stephen L Hillis, David G Tinkelman, Marita G Titler, Mark W Vander Weg

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

David A KatzDepartment of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA. david-katz@uiowa.edu
John E Holman
Andrew S Nugent
Laurence J Baker
Skyler R Johnson
Stephen L Hillis
David G Tinkelman
Marita G Titler
Mark W Vander Weg

Funding

The Effectiveness of Smoking Cessation Guidelines in the Emergency DepartmentR21DA021607 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI KATZ, DAVID A · 2008 to 2009
$413k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA021607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe focus on acute care, time pressure, and lack of resources hamper the implementation of smoking cessation guidelines in the emergency department (ED). The purpose of this study was to determine whether an emergency nurse- initiated intervention based on the 5A's (Ask-Advise-Assess-Assist-Arrange) framework improves quit rates.

methodsWe conducted a pre-post implementation trial in 789 adult smokers who presented to two EDs in Iowa between August 13, 2008 and August 4, 2010. The intervention focused on improving delivery of the 5A's by ED nurses and physicians using academic detailing, charting/reminder tools, and group feedback. Performance of ED cessation counseling was measured using a 5A's composite score (ranging from 0 to 5). Smoking status was assessed by telephone interview at 3- and 6-month follow-up (with biochemical confirmation in those participants who reported abstinence at 6-month follow-up).

resultsBased on data from 650 smokers who completed the post-ED interview, there was a significant improvement in the mean 5A's composite score for emergency nurses during the intervention period at both hospitals combined (1.51 vs. 0.88, difference = 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.41, 0.85]). At 6-month follow-up, 7-day point prevalence abstinence (PPA) was 6.8 and 5.1% in intervention and preintervention periods, respectively (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.7, 95% CI [0.99, 2.9]).

conclusionsIt is feasible to improve the delivery of brief smoking cessation counseling by ED staff. The observed improvements in performance of cessation counseling, however, did not translate into statistically significant improvements in cessation rates. Further improvements in the effectiveness of ED cessation interventions are needed.

Indexed as

Smoking PreventionAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCounselingEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNursing Evaluation ResearchNursing Staff, HospitalPractice Patterns, Nurses'Smoking CessationTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID23125437
PMCPMC6080418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.