Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23125199›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine2012

The pathogenesis and natural history of type 1 diabetes.

Mark A Atkinson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02234947 (Pancreas Volume in Preclinical Type 1 Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 135 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
135citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02234947 completednot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Pancreas Volume in Preclinical Type 1 Diabetes

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of FloridaRan2013 to 2023Enrolled246ConditionsType 1 DiabetesArmsMRI, US, and blood samples
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

135 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 310 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Vaccines · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

75 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark A AtkinsonCollege of Medicine, Departments of Pathology and Pediatrics, The University of Florida, Gainesville, 32610-0275, USA. atkinson@ufl.edu
Florida College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to provide an overview that summarizes much in the way of our current state of knowledge regarding the pathogenesis and natural history of type 1 diabetes in humans. This information is presented to the reader as a series of seminal historical discoveries that, when advanced through research, transformed our understanding of the roles for the immune system, genes, and environment in the formation of this disease. In addition, where longitudinal investigations of these three facets occurred, their roles within the development of type 1 diabetes, from birth to symptomatic onset and beyond, are discussed, including their most controversial elements. Having an understanding of this disorder's pathogenesis and natural history is key for attempts seeking to understand the issues of what causes type 1 diabetes, as well as to develop a means to prevent and cure the disorder.

Indexed as

AutoimmunityEnvironmental ExposureGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseAutoantibodiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1DietHumansImmunity, CellularVirus DiseasesAutoantibodies

Identifiers

PMID23125199
PMCPMC3543105
OpenAlexW2165057708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.