Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23125019›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2012

Disulfide bond formation in the mammalian endoplasmic reticulum.

Neil J Bulleid

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Neil J BulleidInstitute of Molecular, Cellular and Systems Biology, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom. neil.bulleid@glasgow.ac.uk
University of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 88053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The formation of disulfide bonds between cysteine residues occurs during the folding of many proteins that enter the secretory pathway. As the polypeptide chain collapses, cysteines brought into proximity can form covalent linkages during a process catalyzed by members of the protein disulfide isomerase family. There are multiple pathways in mammalian cells to ensure disulfides are introduced into proteins. Common requirements for this process include a disulfide exchange protein and a protein oxidase capable of forming disulfides de novo. In addition, any incorrect disulfides formed during the normal folding pathway are removed in a process involving disulfide exchange. The pathway for the reduction of disulfides remains poorly characterized. This work will cover the current knowledge in the field and discuss areas for future investigation.

Indexed as

AnimalsCysteineDisulfidesEndoplasmic ReticulumModels, BiologicalOxidation-ReductionProtein Disulfide-IsomerasesSignal TransductionCysteineDisulfidesProtein Disulfide-Isomerases

Identifiers

PMID23125019
PMCPMC3536336
OpenAlexW2138152079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.