Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23124935›Full record

Trial reportArthritis and rheumatism2013

Rituximab in the treatment of refractory adult and juvenile dermatomyositis and adult polymyositis: a randomized, placebo-phase trial.

Chester V Oddis, Ann M Reed, Rohit Aggarwal, Lisa G Rider, Dana P Ascherman, Marc C Levesque, Richard J Barohn, Brian M Feldman, Michael O Harris-Love, Diane C Koontz and 6 more

5 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Arthritis and rheumatism, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 276 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
276citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
25.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00106184 phase2completednot on this map

Rituximab Therapy in Refractory Adult and Juvenile Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy (IIM)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2006 to 2010Enrolled200ConditionsMyositis, Dermatomyositis, Polymyositis, Juvenile DermatomyositisArmsRituximab, Placebo
NCT01906372 phase2completednot on this map

Open Label Proof of Concept Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Adrenocorticotropic Hormone Gel in Refractory Dermatomyositis or Polymyositis

TypeinterventionalSponsorRohit Aggarwal, MDRan2013 to 2016Enrolled12ConditionsDermatomyositis, PolymyositisArmsAdrenocorticotropic Hormone Gel
NCT02043548 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Tocilizumab in the Treatment of Refractory Polymyositis and Dermatomyositis

TypeinterventionalSponsorChester OddisRan2014 to 2019Enrolled36ConditionsDermatomyositis, PolymyositisArmstocilizumab, placebo
NCT02594735 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Abatacept for the Treatment of Refractory Juvenile Dermatomyositis

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeorge Washington UniversityRan2015 to 2021Enrolled10ConditionsDermatomyositisArmsAbatacept
NCT03414086 completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Predictor of Clinical Response to Acthar in Myositis: Phase II of Acthar Clinical Trial

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2017 to 2022Enrolled20ConditionsMyositis, Dermatomyositis, PolymyositisArmsHealthy Control, Myositis in Remission
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

276 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 679 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Guideline
  11. Guideline
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Emerging therapies in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

216 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Chester V OddisUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. cvo5@pitt.edu
Ann M Reed
Rohit Aggarwal
Lisa G Rider
Dana P Ascherman
Marc C Levesque
Richard J Barohn
Brian M Feldman
Michael O Harris-Love
Diane C Koontz
Noreen Fertig
Stephanie S Kelley
Sherrie L Pryber
Frederick W Miller
Howard E Rockette
RIM Study Group
University of Pittsburgh · USNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · USMayo Clinic · USNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USSickKids Foundation · CAUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · USUniversity of Miami · USWashington DC VA Medical Center · US

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000005 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$50.8M
WRITING AND WT LOSS MAINTENANCEM01RR023940 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAROHN, RICHARD J. · 2007 to 2009
$6.6M
HEARTLAND INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHUL1RR033179 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAROHN, RICHARD J. · 2011 to 2011
$3.2M
Pain Mechanisms and Outcomes in OsteoarthritisK23AR060241 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PHILLIPS, KRISTINE · 2011 to 2015
$670k
Intramural NIH HHSNCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000005NCRR NIH HHS M01-RR-023940NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR033179NCRR NIH HHS UL1-RR-033179NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR060241NIAMS NIH HHS N01-AR-4-2273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the safety and efficacy of rituximab in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-phase trial in adult and pediatric myositis patients.

methodsAdults with refractory polymyositis (PM) and adults and children with refractory dermatomyositis (DM) were enrolled. Entry criteria included muscle weakness and ≥2 additional abnormal values on core set measures (CSMs) for adults. Juvenile DM patients required ≥3 abnormal CSMs, with or without muscle weakness. Patients were randomized to receive either rituximab early or rituximab late, and glucocorticoid or immunosuppressive therapy was allowed at study entry. The primary end point compared the time to achieve the International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Group preliminary definition of improvement (DOI) between the 2 groups. The secondary end points were the time to achieve ≥20% improvement in muscle strength and the proportions of patients in the early and late rituximab groups achieving the DOI at week 8.

resultsAmong 200 randomized patients (76 with PM, 76 with DM, and 48 with juvenile DM), 195 showed no difference in the time to achieving the DOI between the rituximab late (n = 102) and rituximab early (n = 93) groups (P = 0.74 by log rank test), with a median time to achieving a DOI of 20.2 weeks and 20.0 weeks, respectively. The secondary end points also did not significantly differ between the 2 treatment groups. However, 161 (83%) of the randomized patients met the DOI, and individual CSMs improved in both groups throughout the 44-week trial.

conclusionAlthough there were no significant differences in the 2 treatment arms for the primary and secondary end points, 83% of adult and juvenile myositis patients with refractory disease met the DOI. The role of B cell-depleting therapies in myositis warrants further study, with consideration for a different trial design.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntirheumatic AgentsChildDermatomyositisDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGlucocorticoidsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle WeaknessPain MeasurementPlacebosAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntirheumatic AgentsGlucocorticoidsPlacebosRituximab

Identifiers

PMID23124935
PMCPMC3558563
OpenAlexW2076417190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.