Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23124882›Full record

ReviewFrontiers of medicine2012

PulseNet China, a model for future laboratory-based bacterial infectious disease surveillance in China.

Wei Li, Shan Lu, Zhigang Cui, Jinghua Cui, Haijian Zhou, Yiqing Wang, Zhujun Shao, Changyun Ye, Biao Kan, Jianguo Xu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers of medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evaluation of molecular typing of foodborne pathogens in European reference laboratories from 2012 to 2013.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Wei LiState Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, China CDC, Beijing 100026, China.
Shan Lu
Zhigang Cui
Jinghua Cui
Haijian Zhou
Yiqing Wang
Zhujun Shao
Changyun Ye
Biao Kan
Jianguo Xu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surveillance is critical for the prevention and control of infectious disease. China's real-time web-based infectious disease reporting system is a distinguished achievement. However, many aspects of the current China Infectious Disease Surveillance System do not yet meet the demand for timely outbreak detection and identification of emerging infectious disease. PulseNet, the national molecular typing network for foodborne disease surveillance was first established by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of the United States in 1995 and has proven valuable in the early detection of outbreaks and tracing the pathogen source. Since 2001, the China CDC laboratory for bacterial pathogen analysis has been a member of the PulseNet International family; and has been adapting the idea and methodology of PulseNet to develop a model for a future national laboratory-based surveillance system for all bacterial infectious disease.We summarized the development progress for the PulseNet China system and discussed it as a model for the future of China's national laboratory-based surveillance system.

Indexed as

Bacterial InfectionsBacterial Typing TechniquesChinaCommunicable Diseases, EmergingDisease OutbreaksDysentery, BacillaryElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldFood MicrobiologyHumansInformation DisseminationLaboratoriesMeningitis, MeningococcalMultilocus Sequence TypingNeisseria meningitidis, Serogroup CPopulation SurveillancePublic Health Informatics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.