Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23124709›Full record

ReviewSurgery today2013

Extraperitoneal colostomy in laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection using a laparoscopic retractor.

Shintaro Akamoto, Seiji Noge, Jun Uemura, Norikatsu Maeda, Minoru Ohshima, Hirotaka Kashiwagi, Naoki Yamamoto, Masao Fujiwara, Shinichi Yachida, Takehiro Takama and 4 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Surgery today, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Circular Stapler-Assisted Extraperitoneal Colostomy in Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Resection: a Single Surgeon Experience.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shintaro AkamotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Ikenobe, Miki-cho, Kita-gun, Kagawa 761-0793, Japan. akamoto@med.kagawa-u.ac.jp
Seiji Noge
Jun Uemura
Norikatsu Maeda
Minoru Ohshima
Hirotaka Kashiwagi
Naoki Yamamoto
Masao Fujiwara
Shinichi Yachida
Takehiro Takama
Masanobu Hagiike
Keiichi Okano
Hisashi Usuki
Yasuyuki Suzuki
Kagawa University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although extraperitoneal colostomy is often performed to prevent postoperative parastomal hernia formation following an open abdominoperineal resection of lower rectal cancer, it has not been widely employed laparoscopically because of the difficulty associated with the extraperitoneal route. This paper describes a laparoscopic extraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy using the Endo Retract™ Maxi instrument. This surgical technique is easy, and helps to prevent the development of parastomal hernias.

Indexed as

AbdomenColon, SigmoidColostomyHernia, VentralHumansLaparoscopyPerineumPeritoneumPostoperative ComplicationsRectal NeoplasmsRectum

Identifiers

PMID23124709
OpenAlexW1974221780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.