Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23124576›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health and preventive medicine2013

Reducing radiation exposure using commonly available objects.

Daisuke Kobayashi, Masao Miyake, Takeyasu Kakamu, Masayoshi Tsuji, Yayoi Mori, Tetsuhito Fukushima, Akihiro Hazama

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health and preventive medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daisuke KobayashiDepartment of Cellular and Integrative Physiology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan. coba@fmu.ac.jp
Masao Miyake
Takeyasu Kakamu
Masayoshi Tsuji
Yayoi Mori
Tetsuhito Fukushima
Akihiro Hazama

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOne and a half years have passed since the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant disaster. The environmental radiation dose rate was not critical, but an existing exposure situation has been identified in a large part of Fukushima Prefecture. Although people continue to live and work in the contaminated area, they are not provided with sufficient information to reduce their exposure to radiation by themselves. In this study, we attempt to evaluate the efficiency of radiation shielding by using everyday items widely available to people.

methodsNaI scintillation and Geiger-Müller survey meters were used to measure the radiation dose of (1) contaminated soil and (2) soil covered with commonly available items.

resultsIn the soil at a depth of 10 cm from the surface, the radiation dose rate decreased from 3.36 to 0.65 μSv/h, and the count rate decreased from 3,120 to 352 cpm. Both the radiation dose rate and count rate reduced when the soil was covered with everyday items, such as a magazine more than 20 mm thick, a polystyrene foam board, and a wooden board of the same thickness.

conclusionsTo protect residents from unnecessary radiation exposure in the existing exposure situation, covering contaminated soil with a wooden board or a magazine, either of them 20 mm thick, is useful to reduce the radiation dose.

Indexed as

Radiation DosageEnvironmental ExposureFukushima Nuclear AccidentHumansJapanRadiation MonitoringRadiation ProtectionRadiometryScintillation CountingSoil Pollutants, RadioactiveSoil Pollutants, Radioactive

Identifiers

PMID23124576
PMCPMC3709043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.