ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2013
The utilization of carotid artery imaging beyond metabolic scores and high-sensitivity CRP in screening intermediate-to-high Framingham risk of asymptomatic Taiwanese population.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Circulating Monocyte Count as a Surrogate Marker for Ventricular-Arterial Remodeling and Incident Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Tailoring the implementation of new biomarkers based on their added predictive value in subgroups of individuals.PloS one · 2015Article
- Paraoxonase (PON1) activity in patients with subclinical thoracic aortic atherosclerosis.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To compare the diagnostic accuracy of various cardiovascular screening tools in asymptomatic subjects with intermediate-to-high risk Framingham risk score (FRS). In addition, we also investigated whether carotid artery study could further add incremental value beyond metabolic abnormality and inflammatory marker in this issue. 1,200 asymptomatic subjects who underwent health evaluation were recruited in our study. FRS was calculated in all participants based on clinical variables, body surface electrocardiography, medical histories, and life styles. Metabolic scores, serum high-sensitivity C reactive protein (hs-CRP) level and carotid artery study in assessing intima-media-thickness (CIMT) and plaque were all obtained and compared to FRS. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy was then conducted among these different tools aiming at a more efficient screen in identifying intermediate-to-high FRS. Of all, 1,101 participants (mean age 50.6 ± 10.4, 38.6 % women) were finally entered in our study after exclusion of known cardiovascular diseases. By utilizing common carotid IMT (CCIMT) equal or larger than 1 mm, best specificity (98.27, 95 % CI 97.24-98.99) was achieved in identifying intermediate-to-high FRS subject. The most optimal cut-off in identifying intermediate-to-high FRS for metabolic scores, hs-CRP and CCIMT was 2, 0.101 mg/dL and 0.65 mm, respectively. Both receiver operating characteristic curve and likelihood ratio tests showed that information provided by carotid artery study further showed significant incremental value when superimposed on metabolic scores and hs-CRP (all p < 0.05) in screening intermediate-to-high FRS subjects. Though diagnostic accuracy may differ to some degree by using different cut-off values, a low metabolic score seemed to have the best sensitivity with abnormal CCIMT yielded highest specificity in screening a subject with future cardiovascular risks. Carotid artery study added significant clinical incremental value in discriminating projected risk beyond metabolic scores and hs-CRP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.