ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2013
Public attitudes towards people with depression in times of uncertainty: results from three population surveys in Germany.
Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Psychosocial Impact of Quarantine Measures During Serious Coronavirus Outbreaks: A Rapid Review].Psychiatrische Praxis · 2020Article
- Overweight and Lonely? A Representative Study on Loneliness in Obese People and Its Determinants.Obesity facts · 2019Article
- EPA guidance on mental health and economic crises in Europe.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2016Review
- Collective levels of stigma and national suicide rates in 25 European countries.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2015Article
- Viewpoint survey of mental health service users' experiences of discrimination in England 2008-2012.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2014Article
- Article
- Has the public taken notice of psychiatric reform? The image of psychiatric hospitals in Germany 1990-2011.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2013Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe recent increase of so-called precarious work conditions plus the current financial crisis have led to a growing sense of uncertainty among the public. This may have repercussions on attitudes towards people with mental illness. Particularly, the public may have become more reluctant to support access to work for these people.
methodsIn 1990, 2001 and 2011, population surveys were conducted in the "old" states of Germany, using the same sampling procedure, interview mode and measures. Within the context of a fully structured interview respondents were presented a case-vignette depicting a person with symptoms of depression. They were then asked how willing they would be to accept the person in the vignette in various social relationships.
resultsWhile the German public's unwillingness to recommend an individual with depression for a job remained unchanged during the 1990s, it increased significantly during the subsequent decade. By contrast, in all other social relationships studied, no increase of the desire for social distance could be observed during this time period. The trend towards withholding access to jobs was most pronounced among employed respondents.
conclusionsThe results of our study underline the importance of macro-social factors for the discrimination of people with mental illness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23124482What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.