Trial reportClinical biochemistry2013
Comparison of hematologic measurements between local and central laboratories: data from the BABY HUG trial.
Trial report in Clinical biochemistry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions for chronic kidney disease in people with sickle cell disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Hydroxyurea (hydroxycarbamide) for sickle cell disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Interventions for preventing silent cerebral infarcts in people with sickle cell disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Interventions for chronic kidney disease in people with sickle cell disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Interventions for preventing silent cerebral infarcts in people with sickle cell disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Hydroxyurea (hydroxycarbamide) for sickle cell disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the concordance of blood count indices measured locally and at a central laboratory. DESIGN AND
methodsIn a multi-center clinical trial of hydroxyurea therapy in infants with sickle cell anemia (BABY HUG), the concordance between blood count indices measured locally and at a central laboratory was investigated.
resultsLocal laboratory measurements of neutrophil and monocyte counts were significantly higher (44% and 37%, respectively) compared to the central measurements (p<0.0001), and mean corpuscular volume (MCV) was higher centrally.
conclusionOvernight shipping with processing delay causes spurious reductions in absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and absolute monocyte count (AMC) that may result in incorrect monitoring decisions in multicenter clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.