Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23122176›Full record

ReviewThe Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice2012

Feline deafness.

David K Ryugo, Marilyn Menotti-Raymond

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Development of Auditory Cortex Circuits.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cochleosaccular (Scheibe) dysplasia in dogs: A temporal bone study.Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Hearing disorders in cats.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2017
    Review
  13. Review
  14. The Genetics of Deafness in Domestic Animals.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2015
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Sensorineural deafness in purebred white Devon Rex cats.Journal of veterinary internal medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

David K RyugoHearing Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia. d.ryugo@garvan.org.au
Marilyn Menotti-Raymond
Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · USGarvan Institute of Medical Research · AU

Funding

STUDIES OF THE COCHLEAR NUCLEUS GRANULE CELL DOMAINR01DC004395 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI RYUGO, DAVID K. · 2000 to 2010
$3.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC004395NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004395PHS HHS HHSN26120080001E
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cats have among the best hearing of all mammals in that they are extremely sensitive to a broad range of frequencies. The ear is a highly complex structure that is delicately balanced in terms of its biochemistry, types of receptors, ion channels, mechanical properties, and cellular organization. Sensorineural deafness is caused by "flawed" genes that are inherited from one or both parents. Hearing loss can also be acquired as a result of noise trauma from industrialized environment, viral infection, or blunt trauma. To date, it is not practical to intervene and attempt to correct these forms of deafness in cats.

Indexed as

AnimalsCat DiseasesCatsDeafnessEarEar DiseasesEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemHearing Loss, SensorineuralPresbycusis

Identifiers

PMID23122176
PMCPMC3490225
OpenAlexW4210958131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.